Amer Delic vs Michal Przysiezny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Delic vs Przysiezny analysis and find out who is favored!
Amer Delic vs Michal Przysiezny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Delic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Przysiezny has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Delic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Przysiezny has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Delic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Przysiezny has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Delic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Przysiezny winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Delic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 69/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 12/ 20). Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Delic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Delic winning 2 and Przysiezny winning 0. The last match between Delic and Przysiezny was at the Seoul Challenger, 18-10-2011, First, Hard with Amer Delic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Delic and Przysiezny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Delic winning 0 times and Przysiezny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Delic winning 1, and Przysiezny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Delic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Przysiezny has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Delic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Przysiezny has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Delic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Przysiezny has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Delic 1 - 0 Przysiezny
7
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
60
High
41
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
55% (272-221)
Career Total W/L
56% (465-368)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$300,634
Career Prize Money
$403,630
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Delic VS Przysiezny H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Amer Delic | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Delic VS Przysiezny H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Amer Delic | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amer Delic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Andrew Fitzpatrick
Player
Amer Delic
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
31
Total Points Won
37
|
2-6 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Amer Delic
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
14
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ruben Bemelmans
Player
Amer Delic
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Peter Polansky
Player
Amer Delic
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amer Delic
Player
James Lemke
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Kuznetsov
Player
Amer Delic
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Catalin-Ionut Gard
Player
Amer Delic
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Amer Delic
Player
Daniel Kosakowski
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Amer Delic
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Rubber 4 | 7-6(16) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more