Amelie Van Impe vs Camilla Gennaro Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent months, both Impe and Gennaro have displayed comparable performance on their second serves, with Impe winning 40.15% and Gennaro achieving a slightly higher 40.53% of points. This parity is indicative of the closely contested nature expected in their upcoming clash.

Turning to return game statistics, Impe demonstrates an upper hand by securing 48.97% of points on their opponent's second serve, compared to Gennaro’s 47.67%. Additionally, in first serve return scenarios, Impe again edges out Gennaro by winning 33.42% of points versus Gennaro’s 31.96%. This data, which highly correlates with match predictions, suggests Impe may have the advantage in return games.

When it comes to handling pressure situations, particularly breakpoints, Gennaro shows superior composure with a save rate of 49.3% against Impe’s 43.27%. The ability to withstand pressure is pivotal, especially in predicting outcomes during live-betting scenarios.

Reviewing their overall performance over the past year, Impe shows a more robust win record, achieving victory in 62.07% of matches, while Gennaro holds a win rate of 54.24%. Despite Impe's higher percentage, it’s crucial to recognize the competitive level where these matches have occurred, with Impe primarily participating in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, and Gennaro competing in the higher-tier Challengers/ITF > $10K events.

The players' preferences on court surfaces further inform predictions. Both competitors find success on clay, where Impe holds a 67% win rate, outperforming Gennaro's 56%. Conversely, Gennaro’s vulnerability shows more on indoor hard courts, with only 44% wins compared to Impe’s 59% success rate.

Opponent caliber over the last year reveals that Impe has faced slightly tougher competition, with an average opponent rank of 344.86 compared to Gennaro’s average rank of 378.59. This gives Impe an edge in competitive experience.

Deciding set performances highlight Gennaro's strength, winning 68% of such sets, significantly surpassing Impe's 40% win rate. This statistic is vital for anticipating outcomes should the match extend to a deciding set.

Cumulatively, these insights point slightly in favor of Impe, courtesy of his superiority in returns and match win percentage under varied conditions. While Gennaro excels under pressure and in deciding sets, the overall statistical edge leans towards Impe, making him the stronger contender for victory based on current indicators.