Amelia Honer vs Yexin Ma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jun at 06:59 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Honer vs Y. Ma

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Honer 1 - 0 Ma
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amelia Honer winning 2 and Yexin Ma winning 0. The last match between Amelia Honer and Yexin Ma was at the W75 Sumter, 03-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Amelia Honer getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Honer | 1 |
| Ma | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W75 Sumter(06-03-25)
A. Honer vs Y. Ma H2H Profile
A. Honer vs Y. Ma Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance indicates Ma has been more successful, winning 37.4% of points, compared to Honer's 0%. Could this suggest Ma has a stronger second serve?
- When examining return games, Ma also shows superiority, capturing 49.4% of opponents' second serves and 31.11% of first serves, while Honer registers 0% in both categories. Is Ma's return game a key strength?
- In pressure situations, Ma excels by saving 48.98% of break points recently, whereas Honer lags with a 0% save rate. Can Ma's resilience under pressure shape the match outcome?
- Analyzing match performance over the past year, Ma has a win rate of 49.23%, while Honer's is significantly higher at 76.47%. Does Honer's overall winning trend put them at an advantage?
- On the best surface, Ma shines on clay with a 56% win rate, whereas Honer thrives on hard courts with 71%. How might these surface preferences affect the match?
- Both players have mainly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments. Ma has a 54% win rate, and Honer an 80% rate. Does Honer's success in similar event levels tip the scales?
- Quality of opposition shows little difference, with Ma facing average ranks of 345.85 and Honer 342.88. Does this indicate comparable levels of challenge?
- In deciding sets, Ma wins 45%, while Honer wins an impressive 75%. Could Honer's decisive play be the clincher if the match goes the distance?
- Regarding break point conversion in recent times, Ma operates at 37.19%, yet Honer hasn't capitalized on such opportunities. How crucial is Ma's break point efficiency?
Editorial Prediction (June 3, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating both players' recent performances, Ma shows distinct strengths in second serve success and return games, establishing a potential edge in the upcoming match through versatile gameplay.
Honer, despite stellar overall match performance over the last year, seems less effective in critical statistics such as break point conversion. Furthermore, Ma exhibits significant resilience under pressure, which might be decisive.
Given that surfaces influence play style, Honer's prowess on hard courts could offer an advantage if the conditions align, yet Ma's robust statistical backing possibly tips the scales.
Overall, considering the statistical insights and analysis, Ma appears slightly more favored to win this tennis matchup, assuming pivotal patterns hold true in play.
Amelia Honer vs Yexin Ma Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Honer vs Y. Ma H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:31:11 | Average Match Time | 1:31:11 |
| 74% (42/57) | 1st Serve % | 65% (33/51) |
| 64% (27/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (18/33) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (4/18) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 57% (29/51) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Honer Recent Matches Played
Y. Ma Recent Matches Played

A. Honer vs Y. Ma Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.67% (28/14) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.51% (290/242) |
| 63.92% (62/35) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.99% (656/559) |
| 54.98% (480/393) | Games Win/Loss | 52.34% (5766/5250) |
| 67.50% (27/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.19% (220/186) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.79% (40/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.97% (23/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (7/7) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 59 | Aces Total | 634 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 121 | Total Double Faults | 1607 |
| 1:51:30 | Average Match Time | 1:26:43 |
| 120.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 487.02 |
| 64% (1790/2816) | 1st Serve % | 59% (17491/29798) |
| 61% (1092/1790) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (10686/17491) |
| 48% (493/1026) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5664/12305) |
| 47% (185/394) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1976/4133) |
| 48% (1328/2772) | Return Points Win % | 47% (14466/30674) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 69.23% (18/8) | Challenger W/L | 53.73% (173/149) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Futures W/L | 58.47% (107/76) |
| 69% (27/39) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (283/522) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (5/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (50/97) |
| 57% (8/14) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (78/161) |
| 92% (25/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (302/254) |
| 8% (25/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (302/47) |
| 24% (17/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (230/35) |