Amaury Raynel vs Dinko Dinev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Oct at 11:30 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Raynel vs D. Dinev

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

BUL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Raynel 0 - 1 Dinev
They have played 3 sets in total, with Amaury Raynel winning 1 and Dinko Dinev winning 2. The last match between Dinko Dinev and Amaury Raynel was at the M25 Kigali, 17-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Dinko Dinev getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Raynel | 0 |
Dinev | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Kigali(10-17-25)
A. Raynel vs D. Dinev H2H Profile
A. Raynel vs D. Dinev Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Amaury Raynel has a slight edge over Dinko Dinev, with a second serve point win rate of 41.02% compared to 40.20%.
- Return Game: Raynel also shows a small advantage in return games, winning 50.65% of opponents' second serve points versus Dinev's 49.34%.
- First Serve Returns: Raynel leads again, winning 32.52% of points compared to Dinev's 30.06% on first serve returns.
- Under Pressure: Dinev has a marginally better breakpoint save percentage at 51.67% compared to Raynel's 50.74%.
- Overall Performance: Raynel's win rate over the last year is 53.13%, slightly higher than Dinev's 52.83%.
- Surface Strength: Raynel excels on hard courts, while Dinev prefers clay with equivalent 62% win rates on their best surfaces.
- Opponent Quality: Dinev has faced tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 326.34 against Raynel's 370.47.
- Deciding Sets: Dinev is stronger in deciding sets, winning 56% of them compared to Raynel's 39% in the past year.
- Event Level: Both players have mostly competed in $10K ITF tournaments, with similar win percentages around 54%.
Editorial Prediction (October 17, 2025, UTC):
Amaury Raynel displays a consistent edge over Dinko Dinev in both second serve performance and return games, which are critical factors in determining match outcomes. This slight advantage is reflected in his marginally higher win rate over the last year.
However, Dinko Dinev shows resilience under pressure with a better breakpoint save rate and outperforms Raynel in deciding sets, indicating that he could capitalize on high-stakes moments during the match.
When considering the competition level and win percentage on preferred surfaces, both players have comparable records, albeit with different strengths. Raynel's proficiency on hard courts contrasts with Dinev's expertise on clay, even as both compete extensively at similar event levels.
Given the analysis of these performance metrics, while both players possess distinct advantages, Amaury Raynel's consistent performance metrics give him a slight edge, suggesting he is likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Amaury Raynel vs Dinko Dinev Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Raynel vs D. Dinev H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
1 | Sets Won | 2 |
13 | Games Won | 14 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:50:35 | Average Match Time | 1:50:35 |
71% (52/73) | 1st Serve % | 65% (53/81) |
60% (31/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (33/53) |
38% (8/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (8/28) |
50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
49% (40/81) | Return Points Win % | 47% (34/73) |
0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Raynel Recent Matches Played
D. Dinev Recent Matches Played

A. Raynel vs D. Dinev Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57.19% (179/134) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.93% (95/69) |
55.83% (407/322) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.89% (204/161) |
52.97% (3643/3235) | Games Win/Loss | 52.32% (1804/1644) |
62.11% (59/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.02% (25/24) |
55.41% (82/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.40% (70/44) |
54.29% (38/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
386 | Aces Total | 283 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
745 | Total Double Faults | 384 |
1:30:53 | Average Match Time | 1:5:6 |
402.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.42 |
67% (11706/17602) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4447/7401) |
62% (7253/11706) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2861/4447) |
47% (2783/5896) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1316/2953) |
46% (963/2080) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (326/749) |
44% (7801/17622) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2957/7061) |
36.36% (4/7) | Challenger W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
57.95% (175/127) | Futures W/L | 59.21% (90/62) |
57% (177/311) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (93/161) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
44% (33/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (14/24) |
51% (53/103) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (24/40) |
84% (173/145) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (88/80) |
16% (173/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (88/8) |
24% (140/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (76/15) |