Amaury Raynel vs Daniel Uta Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Sep at 02:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Raynel vs D. Uta

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Raynel 1 - 0 Uta
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amaury Raynel winning 2 and Daniel Uta winning 0. The last match between Amaury Raynel and Daniel Uta was at the Targu Mures 2 Challenger, 17-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Amaury Raynel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Raynel | 1 |
Uta | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) Targu Mures 2 Challenger(09-17-25)
A. Raynel vs D. Uta H2H Profile
A. Raynel vs D. Uta Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Uta has won 40.71% of their second serve points, slightly outperforming Raynel's 40.07%. Which player’s serving gives them a strategic edge? Uta, though marginally.
- Return Game Analysis: Raynel leads significantly in returning second serves, winning 49.78% to Uta’s 41.11%. On first serve returns, Raynel again outperforms with 31.25% over Uta’s 28.12%.
- Under Pressure Performance: Uta has saved 56.04% of breakpoints, showing more resilience than Raynel, who has a 46.62% save rate. This suggests Uta handles critical moments better.
- Overall Match Wins: Raynel shows stronger consistency with a 54.1% win rate over the past year compared to Uta's 43.24%.
- Surface Preference: Uta favors Clay, winning 40% of their matches, while Raynel excels on Hard courts, achieving a 62% win rate.
- Competitive Level Engagement: Uta and Raynel have both participated mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Raynel enjoying a superior success rate of 53.45% relative to Uta's 43.75%.
- Opponent Quality: Uta has competed against tougher opponents, with average rankings of 220.76, whereas Raynel has faced less competitive players, averaging a rank of 376.3.
- Deciding Set Advantage: Raynel shows better performance, winning 42% of deciding sets, compared to Uta's 30% win rate in similar scenarios.
- Critical Breakpoint Conversion: Uta converts breakpoints at a higher rate of 41.67%, outshining Raynel's 37.17% conversion rate, which speaks to Uta’s ability in turning games around.
Editorial Prediction (September 17, 2025, UTC):
Both players exhibit contrasting strengths: Uta excels under pressure and has better breakpoint conversion, while Raynel shows dominance in returning and overall match success.
The choice of surface may influence the outcome significantly. Uta's clay preference may not align favorably if the match is on a hard court, where Raynel has a strong record.
Considering recent form and statistics, Raynel appears to have an advantage, especially if the match extends into a deciding set. Hence, Raynel is likely the favored contender for victory in this upcoming match.
Amaury Raynel vs Daniel Uta Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Raynel vs D. Uta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:12:45 | Average Match Time | 1:12:45 |
92% (49/53) | 1st Serve % | 64% (34/53) |
55% (27/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (15/34) |
100% (4/4) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (4/19) |
50% (7/14) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
64% (34/53) | Return Points Win % | 42% (22/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Raynel Recent Matches Played
D. Uta Recent Matches Played

A. Raynel vs D. Uta Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57.00% (175/132) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.31% (25/42) |
55.68% (397/316) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.46% (58/89) |
52.88% (3557/3170) | Games Win/Loss | 45.58% (603/720) |
62.11% (59/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.46% (25/40) |
54.29% (38/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
384 | Aces Total | 48 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
729 | Total Double Faults | 88 |
1:30:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
395.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 200.64 |
66% (11319/17127) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1038/1711) |
62% (7005/11319) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (597/1038) |
47% (2747/5808) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (261/673) |
46% (932/2014) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (63/135) |
44% (7568/17124) | Return Points Win % | 37% (603/1616) |
36.36% (4/7) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
57.77% (171/125) | Futures W/L | 38.98% (23/36) |
57% (173/305) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (24/66) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
44% (32/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
52% (51/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (4/14) |
84% (168/141) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (25/21) |
16% (168/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (25/4) |
24% (139/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (42/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
