Amandine Hesse vs Qianhui Tang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Hesse vs Q. Tang

Amandine Hesse
FRA
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
32
Age
25
1.64m
Height
-
314
C. Rank
818
154
Best Rank
617
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$234.9K
Career Money
$1.9K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-

Qianhui Tang
CHN
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
32
Age
25
1.64m
Height
-
314
C. Rank
818
154
Best Rank
617
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$234.9K
Career Money
$1.9K
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Hesse 1 - 0 Tang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Amandine Hesse winning 2 and Qianhui Tang winning 1. The last match between Amandine Hesse and Qianhui Tang was at the W100 Oeiras, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Amandine Hesse getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hesse | 1 |
| Tang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W100 Oeiras(04-22-25)
Amandine Hesse
2
7
6
Qianhui Tang
6
5
1
A. Hesse vs Q. Tang H2H Profile
A. Hesse vs Q. Tang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Amandine Hesse has won 36.75% of points on their second serve, while Qianhui Tang has won 35.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Amandine Hesse, in recent form, has won 52.04% of their opponent's second serve points, while Qianhui Tang has won 48.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.39% and 31.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Amandine Hesse has saved 51.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Qianhui Tang has saved 43.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Amandine Hesse has won 46.43% of matches played (W/L 26/30), with Qianhui Tang winning 27.27% (W/L 3/8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Amandine Hesse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 131/99), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/8). Qianhui Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 66/64), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 15/20).
- Player level: In the last year, Amandine Hesse has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 26/28), where as Qianhui Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 16.67% of matches (W/L 1/5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Amandine Hesse winning 1 times and Qianhui Tang being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Amandine Hesse winning 2 and Qianhui Tang winning 1.
- The last match between Amandine Hesse and Qianhui Tang was at the W100 Oeiras, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Amandine Hesse getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:19.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Amandine Hesse has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.93 while Qianhui Tang has played against players with an average rank of 428.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Amandine Hesse has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Qianhui Tang has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Amandine Hesse has converted 42.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Qianhui Tang has converted 35.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Amandine Hesse vs Qianhui Tang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Hesse vs Q. Tang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:8:19 | Average Match Time | 2:8:19 |
| 53% (42/80) | 1st Serve % | 62% (51/82) |
| 64% (27/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (28/51) |
| 47% (18/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 51% (42/82) | Return Points Win % | 44% (35/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hesse 42%, Tang 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hesse 54%, Tang 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Hesse 52%, Tang 49%.
A. Hesse Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | w/o | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q. Tang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-0 6-0 | ||

A. Hesse vs Q. Tang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.04% (447/412) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.13% (85/88) |
| 51.88% (1020/946) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.50% (202/198) |
| 50.76% (9118/8844) | Games Win/Loss | 51.62% (1877/1759) |
| 56.96% (131/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.77% (66/64) |
| 50.13% (199/198) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 51.58% (114/107) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1936 | Aces Total | 196 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2340 | Total Double Faults | 329 |
| 1:3:35 | Average Match Time | 1:10:33 |
| 195.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.2 |
| 51% (19108/37576) | 1st Serve % | 63% (5056/7976) |
| 65% (12422/19108) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (2981/5056) |
| 45% (8234/18464) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1258/2920) |
| 48% (2168/4560) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (487/1042) |
| 45% (16881/37532) | Return Points Win % | 46% (3769/8143) |
| 22.58% (7/24) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.89% (28/44) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 53.04% (332/294) | Challenger W/L | 48.28% (56/60) |
| 62.02% (80/49) | Futures W/L | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 52% (438/846) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (84/169) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 49% (79/160) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (14/33) |
| 48% (123/255) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 83% (466/386) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (93/73) |
| 17% (466/79) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (93/20) |
| 15% (393/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (80/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction09:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction11:05 AM 20/11/25
Prediction01:00 PM 21/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Noma Akugue Noha Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:05
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal