Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amanda Anisimova vs Sloane Stephens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Anisimova vs Stephens analysis and find out who is favored!
Amanda Anisimova vs Sloane Stephens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anisimova has won 46.18% of points on his second serve, while Stephens has won 49.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anisimova, in recent form, has won 57.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stephens has won 54.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.67% and 40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Anisimova has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stephens has saved 57.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Anisimova has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 5/ 4), with Stephens winning 60.38% (W/L 32/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Anisimova has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 47/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Stephens has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 129/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 15/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Anisimova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Stephens has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Anisimova winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Anisimova winning 2 and Stephens winning 0. The last match between Anisimova and Stephens was at the Miami Open - Miami, 26-03-2021, Second, Hard with Amanda Anisimova getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Anisimova and Stephens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Anisimova winning 0 times and Stephens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Anisimova winning 0, and Stephens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anisimova has played against opponents with an average rank of 61 while Stephens has played against players with an average rank of 80.66.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anisimova has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stephens has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Anisimova has converted 52.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stephens has converted 41.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Anisimova 1 - 0 Stephens
237
Rank
21
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
35
Rank
3
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
62% (145-89)
Career Total W/L
58% (362-266)
56% (5-4)
YTD W/L
63% (17-10)
$3,293,931
Career Prize Money
$14,219,901
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amanda Anisimova | Sloane Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (39/60) | 66% (52/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (27/39) | 60% (31/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (9/21) | 26% (7/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (41/79) | 40% (24/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Sloane Stephens
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amanda Anisimova | Sloane Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (5/4) | 63% (17/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 59% (38/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (100/87) | 54% (304/259) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 50% (8/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 82% (9/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 19 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:53 | 1:40:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 61 | 77.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (406/655) | 74% (1380/1863) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (245/406) | 61% (845/1380) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (115/249) | 49% (239/483) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (39/74) | 41% (105/256) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (271/598) | 45% (872/1934) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 55% (6/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 69% (9/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (5/9) | 63% (17/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 82% (17/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 18% (17/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Amanda Anisimova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Amanda Anisimova
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Amanda Anisimova
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
126)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
80)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Alize Cornet
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Amanda Anisimova
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Nadia Podoroska
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Amanda Anisimova
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Amanda Anisimova
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sloane Stephens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Sloane Stephens
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
83%
(
34 of
41)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Elise Mertens
74%
(
70 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Martina Trevisan
75%
(
80 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
98 of
134)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
54 of
98)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
66 of
134)
129
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Magda Linette
82%
(
67 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Caroline Garcia
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Yue Yuan
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Karolina Pliskova
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Peyton Stearns
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Sloane Stephens
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Anisimova Vs Stephens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Amanda Anisimova
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
