Alycia Parks vs Anna Bondar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 May at 08:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Parks vs A. Bondar

 USA
1
Win
Played
2
Win

 HUN
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Parks 1 - 2 Bondar
They have played 6 sets in total, with Alycia Parks winning 2 and Anna Bondar winning 4. The last match between Anna Bondar and Alycia Parks was at the Parma Ladies Open - Parma, 13-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Anna Bondar getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Parks | 1 | 
| Bondar | 2 | 
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R1) Parma Ladies Open - Parma(05-13-25)
(R1) Guangzhou Open - Guangzhou(10-22-24)
(R1) W25 Plantation(01-23-19)
A. Parks vs A. Bondar H2H Profile
A. Parks vs A. Bondar Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance analysis reveals Bondar has an edge, winning 43.52% of points on second serves, compared to Parks' 39.96%.
 - When it comes to returning second serves, Bondar excels with a 48.67% success rate, while Parks follows closely with 45.79%.
 - How about their ability to handle first serve returns? Bondar is superior, winning 33.36% of the points, with Parks managing 28.71%.
 - Examining break-point resilience, Parks is slightly ahead, having saved 51.1% of breakpoints, while Bondar has saved 48.91%.
 - If we consider the match performance over the last 12 months, Bondar has won 58.44% of her matches, whereas Parks slightly edges her out with 61.04% victories.
 - Which surfaces favor each player? Bondar performs best on clay with a 69% win rate, though Parks struggles there with only 44% success. On indoor hard surfaces, Parks thrives with a 66% win percentage.
 - In tournaments over $10K, Parks has a slight edge in win percentage at 83.33%, as opposed to Bondar's 79.41%.
 - They are evenly matched in previous encounters, each having won one out of two matches against the other.
 - In longer matches, Parks shows better performance, winning 63% of deciding sets compared to Bondar's 55% over the past year.
 - Regarding break-point conversion, Bondar is more efficient, converting 33.76% of opportunities compared to Parks' 27.23%.
 
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
In the upcoming match, the stats present a tightly contested battle between Bondar and Parks. Bondar shows superior performance when it comes to second serves and return games, while Parks demonstrates greater resilience in under-pressure situations such as saving break points.
Parks seems to thrive on indoor hard surfaces, and recent patterns reveal her favorable performance in matches stretching to decisive sets. Bondar's higher efficiency in converting break-point opportunities provides another interesting facet in this matchup.
Considering all these factors, Parks' better performance on hard surfaces and in longer matches suggests she might have the edge. Therefore, Parks is predicted to be the likely winner of this match.
Alycia Parks vs Anna Bondar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Parks vs A. Bondar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 | 
| 27 | Games Won | 31 | 
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 2 | 
| 21 | Total Double Faults | 6 | 
| 1:35:8 | Average Match Time | 1:35:8 | 
| 56% (113/202) | 1st Serve % | 59% (93/158) | 
| 69% (78/113) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (69/93) | 
| 42% (37/89) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (32/65) | 
| 64% (7/11) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (9/27) | 
| 36% (57/158) | Return Points Win % | 43% (87/202) | 
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) | 
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
A. Parks Recent Matches Played
A. Bondar Recent Matches Played

A. Parks vs A. Bondar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.31% (213/219) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.98% (444/261) | 
| 48.69% (482/508) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.14% (988/628) | 
| 49.41% (4534/4642) | Games Win/Loss | 54.13% (8167/6920) | 
| 47.89% (102/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.36% (93/75) | 
| 43.80% (60/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.08% (324/145) | 
| 66.07% (37/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.07% (26/33) | 
| 53.85% (14/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 11.11% (1/8) | 
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 | 
| 2104 | Aces Total | 2210 | 
| 0.65 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 
| 2937 | Total Double Faults | 1228 | 
| 1:24:56 | Average Match Time | 1:29:50 | 
| 366.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 442.03 | 
| 55% (13970/25422) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24595/41730) | 
| 68% (9564/13970) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (16223/24595) | 
| 43% (4921/11452) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (8223/17135) | 
| 44% (1163/2648) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2367/5064) | 
| 42% (10353/24786) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18854/42493) | 
| 39.29% (11/17) | Slam W/L | 27.59% (8/21) | 
| 40.74% (22/32) | Masters W/L | 45.00% (18/22) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 47.37% (9/10) | 
| 40.74% (33/48) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (57/57) | 
| 54.58% (131/109) | Challenger W/L | 66.28% (230/117) | 
| 55.17% (16/13) | Futures W/L | 78.21% (122/34) | 
| 49% (212/431) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (436/696) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 52% (54/104) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (97/184) | 
| 55% (70/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (105/211) | 
| 87% (205/178) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (453/394) | 
| 13% (205/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (453/59) | 
| 15% (227/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (252/50) |