Aliona Falei vs Carol Young Suh Lee Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 May at 08:07 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Falei vs C. Young Suh Lee

BLR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Falei 0 - 1 Lee
They have played 2 sets in total, with Aliona Falei winning 0 and Carol Young Suh Lee winning 2. The last match between Carol Young Suh Lee and Aliona Falei was at the W50 Lopota, 09-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Carol Young Suh Lee getting the victory 7-5 4-1 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Falei | 0 |
| Lee | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W50 Lopota(05-09-25)
A. Falei vs C. Y. S. Lee H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $20,012 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.34% (149-90) | Career Total W/L | 75.40% (95-31) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 6 | Titles | 5 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Falei vs C. Y. S. Lee Match Preview:
- Who has the better second serve performance recently? Lee, with 41.83% of points won, slightly edges out Falei's 39.88%.
- Falei outperforms Lee in returning first serves, winning 35.42% of points compared to Lee's 30.73%.
- Lee shows stronger performance in returning second serves, capturing 48.75% compared to Falei's 46.33%.
- Under pressure, Lee shows better breakpoint saving ability, saving 49.87%, whereas Falei saves 47.59%.
- In the last year, Lee has a superior match win rate of 77.42%, compared to Falei's 54.17%.
- What is each player's best surface? Both players excel on Hard courts, with Lee having a higher win rate of 76%, while Falei has a 64% win rate.
- Falei competes mostly at the Challengers/ITF $10K level, winning 60% of those matches, while Lee has a higher success rate of 76.19% at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events.
- Regarding opponent quality, Falei faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 327.9, compared to Lee's 428.45.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Lee is more successful, having won 63% compared to Falei's 50% over the last year.
- How do they convert breakpoints? Falei is more efficient, converting 41.23% of breakpoints compared to Lee's 37.1%.
Editorial Prediction (May 9, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance patterns, Lee demonstrates slightly superior second serve statistics and a stronger return game on second serves. These factors could give Lee a slight edge during critical points in the match.
Falei's consistency and capability in converting breakpoints highlight a potential advantage in seizing scoring opportunities when they arise. However, Lee's general track record of saving breakpoints indicates resilience under pressure.
Considering overall performance and surface proficiency, Lee showcases a more impressive win rate, particularly on hard courts where this match is likely to be contested.
Although Falei faces more formidable opponents on average, Lee's greater success in deciding sets and overall recent match performance suggests they are the more formidable contender in this matchup.
Based on the comparative analysis of both players' strengths and weaknesses, Lee is the most likely winner in the upcoming tennis match.
Aliona Falei vs Carol Young Suh Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Falei vs C. Y. S. Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:42:37 | Average Match Time | 1:42:37 |
| 69% (45/65) | 1st Serve % | 60% (28/47) |
| 58% (26/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (22/28) |
| 40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (11/19) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 30% (14/47) | Return Points Win % | 48% (31/65) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Falei Recent Matches Played
C. Y. S. Lee Recent Matches Played

A. Falei vs C. Y. S. Lee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.34% (149/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 75.40% (95/31) |
| 60.33% (333/219) | Sets Win/Loss | 71.58% (204/81) |
| 54.83% (2718/2239) | Games Win/Loss | 59.76% (1522/1025) |
| 62.13% (105/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 76.92% (90/27) |
| 58.33% (21/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 68.75% (22/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 376 | Aces Total | 336 |
| 0.48 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1160 | Total Double Faults | 227 |
| 1:38:19 | Average Match Time | 1:34:34 |
| 382.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.52 |
| 64% (9666/15213) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4415/7141) |
| 62% (6024/9666) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2952/4415) |
| 43% (2398/5547) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1373/2726) |
| 51% (1054/2049) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (470/973) |
| 48% (7484/15508) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3445/7251) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.75% (102/58) | Challenger W/L | 76.81% (53/16) |
| 63.64% (42/24) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (42/14) |
| 64% (148/233) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 76% (95/125) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (23/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (12/20) |
| 55% (43/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (21/33) |
| 88% (143/126) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (91/85) |
| 12% (143/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (91/6) |
| 24% (96/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (35/11) |