Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alina Charaeva vs Paula Arias Manjon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Charaeva vs Manjon analysis and find out who is favored!
Alina Charaeva vs Paula Arias Manjon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charaeva has won 45.4% of points on his second serve, while Manjon has won 44.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charaeva, in recent form, has won 61.81% of his opponent's second serve points, while Manjon has won 58.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.54% and 41.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charaeva has saved 59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Manjon has saved 50.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charaeva has won 67.69% of matches played (W/L 44/ 21), with Manjon winning 52.08% (W/L 25/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charaeva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13). Manjon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 96/ 77), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 21/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Charaeva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.69% of matches (W/L 44/ 21), where as Manjon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 15/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Charaeva winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Charaeva winning 2 and Manjon winning 1. The last match between Charaeva and Manjon was at the Vinaros, 10-11-2018, Semifinals, Clay with Alina Charaeva getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Charaeva and Manjon have played a deciding set 1 times, with Charaeva winning 1 times and Manjon 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Charaeva winning 0, and Manjon 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charaeva has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.15 while Manjon has played against players with an average rank of 203.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charaeva has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Manjon has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charaeva has converted 52.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Manjon has converted 50.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Charaeva 1 - 0 Manjon
307
Rank
304
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
681
Rank
681
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
66% (119-60)
Career Total W/L
54% (117-98)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$5,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Paula Arias Manjon |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:25:0 | 2:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (50/71) | 64% (62/97) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (31/50) | 50% (31/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (8/21) | 51% (18/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (48/97) | 45% (32/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Alina Charaeva
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Paula Arias Manjon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 42% (5/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (15/12) | 48% (13/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (139/114) | 48% (118/127) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:38 | 1:29:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 433.18 | 136.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (497/872) | 70% (486/697) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (325/497) | 56% (272/486) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (165/375) | 42% (89/211) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (58/120) | 50% (38/76) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (408/843) | 46% (295/637) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 45% (5/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (5/0) |
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
55%
(
66 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
54 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Polina Iatcenko
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Alina Charaeva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
103)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Lena Couto
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Julia Avdeeva
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Paula Arias Manjon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Arias Manjon
Player
Laura Mair
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
42
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Arias Manjon
Player
Sonja Zhenikhova
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
111)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Arias Manjon
Player
Sara Dols
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Arias Manjon
Player
Elena Giovanna Giessler
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
10
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
81%
(
47 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
3-6 6-0 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Granwehr
Player
Paula Arias Manjon
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Charaeva Vs Manjon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
