Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alina Charaeva vs Natsumi Kawaguchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Charaeva vs Kawaguchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Alina Charaeva vs Natsumi Kawaguchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charaeva has won 45.63% of points on his second serve, while Kawaguchi has won 41.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charaeva, in recent form, has won 62.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kawaguchi has won 52.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.34% and 39.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charaeva has saved 58.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kawaguchi has saved 47.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charaeva has won 67.69% of matches played (W/L 44/ 21), with Kawaguchi winning 48.72% (W/L 19/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charaeva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13). Kawaguchi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Charaeva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.69% of matches (W/L 44/ 21), where as Kawaguchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charaeva has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.15 while Kawaguchi has played against players with an average rank of 189.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charaeva has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kawaguchi has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charaeva has converted 52.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kawaguchi has converted 42.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Charaeva 0 - 0 Kawaguchi
306
Rank
304
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
395
Rank
346
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
66% (119-60)
Career Total W/L
61% (78-49)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$5,000
Career Prize Money
$8,310
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Natsumi Kawaguchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (15/12) | 40% (6/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (139/114) | 46% (60/71) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:38 | 1:48:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 433.18 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (497/872) | 72% (294/409) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (325/497) | 58% (171/294) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (165/375) | 37% (43/115) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (58/120) | 44% (24/54) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (408/843) | 45% (199/439) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
55%
(
66 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
54 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Polina Iatcenko
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Alina Charaeva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
103)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Lena Couto
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Julia Avdeeva
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Natsumi Kawaguchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Risako Togashi
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Mio Mushika
68%
(
76 of
112)
1st Serve %
47%
(
57 of
122)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sijia Wei
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
44 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Charaeva Vs Kawaguchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
