Alina Charaeva vs Anastasia Kulikova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• The recent second serve performance is slightly better for Kulikova, who has won 41.94% of points compared to 39.66% for Charaeva.
• Analyzing return game stats, Charaeva edges out Kulikova on opponent's second serve returns with 52.78%, but Kulikova does better on her own second serve with a 51.2% win rate.
• In terms of first serve returns, Charaeva leads significantly with 35.04%, as compared to Kulikova's 28.81%.
• When facing pressure, Kulikova has saved 51.6% of breakpoints in recent times, slightly surpassing Charaeva's 47.24% breakpoint save rate.
• Considering overall performance over the past year, Charaeva has a slight advantage, having won 61.73% of their matches, compared to Kulikova's 59.38%.
• On indoor hard courts, Kulikova excels with a career win percentage of 71%, while Charaeva's best surface is outdoor hard courts with a 67% win rate.
• Both players have played primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K with Charaeva holding a slightly higher win percentage of 62.03%, as opposed to Kulikova’s 56.25%.
• In terms of opponent quality, Charaeva has faced players with an average rank of 312.25 over the last 12 months, making her competition tougher than Kulikova's, who has faced players averaging a 389.28 rank.
• In deciding sets, Charaeva has a marginal edge with a 52% win rate, while Kulikova stands at 50% over the past year.
• For break point conversion recently, Kulikova achieves success 40.31% of the time, narrowly outdoing Charaeva's 39.46% conversion rate.
• Will Charaeva's slightly superior win rates with tougher competition give her the edge in the upcoming match?
• Or will Kulikova's stronger record on certain surfaces and marginally better stats under pressure lead her to victory?

Editorial Prediction (July 28, 2025, UTC):

As Kulikova and Charaeva face off, several key statistics come into play to predict the likely winner of this tennis match. Kulikova has shown slight supremacy in recent second serve performances, as well as in saving breakpoints. On the other hand, Charaeva's edge in first serve returns and better overall match win rate points toward her consistency.

Both players have played mainly in similar tournament levels, but Charaeva’s opponents have been ranked higher on average, demonstrating her capability against tough competitors. This factor, combined with her slightly better record in deciding sets, provides an indication of her resilience and determination.

Ultimately, the contest should be closely fought, with each player presenting a set of strengths that could potentially tilt the match in their favor. Considering the records and stats from the past year, Charaeva seems slightly more positioned for victory due to her marginally higher winning consistency and experience against stronger opponents.

Therefore, based on the analysis, Charaeva is expected to be the more likely winner in this upcoming match.