Alicia Smith vs Natasha Camer-Pesci Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Camer-Pesci analysis and find out who is favored!
Alicia Smith vs Natasha Camer-Pesci Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 41.46% of points on his second serve, while Camer-Pesci has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 57.41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Camer-Pesci has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Camer-Pesci has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 44.83% of matches played (W/L 13/ 16), with Camer-Pesci winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 88/ 100), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 4/ 10). Camer-Pesci has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 9/ 11), where as Camer-Pesci has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smith winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Smith winning 2 and Camer-Pesci winning 0. The last match between Smith and Camer-Pesci was at the W25 Perth, 17-02-2020, Q2 round, Hard with Alicia Smith getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smith and Camer-Pesci have played a deciding set 0 times, with Smith winning 0 times and Camer-Pesci 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smith winning 0, and Camer-Pesci 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 68.72 while Camer-Pesci has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Camer-Pesci has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 45.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Camer-Pesci has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Camer-Pesci
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
899
Rank
662
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
46% (118-137)
Career Total W/L
44% (4-5)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Smith VS Camer-Pesci H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Alicia Smith | Natasha Camer-Pesci |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 1 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Smith VS Camer-Pesci H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alicia Smith | Natasha Camer-Pesci |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (34/39) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.72 | 0 |
Aces Total | 26 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
DFs Total | 14 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:2:20 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (124/223) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (85/124) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 39% (39/99) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 58% (11/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (91/226) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Alicia Smith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Monique Barry
Player
Alicia Smith
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alicia Smith
Player
Elena Micic
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
11
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Elena Micic
Player
Alicia Smith
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
7
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Talia Gibson
Player
Alicia Smith
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mercedes Aristegui
Player
Alicia Smith
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alicia Smith
Player
Jade Otway
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
2
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
11
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
85
Total Points Won
98
|
0-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Saki Imamura
Player
Alicia Smith
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kisa Yoshioka
Player
Alicia Smith
74%
(
64 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hikaru Sato
Player
Alicia Smith
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
8
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alicia Smith
Player
Belle Thompson
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Natasha Camer-Pesci Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Anastasia Berezov
Player
Natasha Camer-Pesci
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more