Alibek Kachmazov vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Predictions Theme: Insights on the Upcoming Tennis Match

Recent performance analysis suggests that Kachmazov has exhibited superior prowess on the second serve, capturing an impressive 52.6% of points, while Zahraj trails behind at 43.8%. It is worth noting that a remarkable correlation exists between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.

Further evaluation of return game statistics reveals that in recent form, Kachmazov has triumphed in 51.18% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Zahraj has secured 54.59%. Comparatively, their success rates on first serve returns stand at 27.66% and 37.14%, respectively. These figures hold substantial significance, as they assist in determining the favored player in their head-to-head encounter.

Under pressure scenarios emphasize Kachmazov's ability to save breakpoints, showcasing an impressive 65.33% success rate in recent matches. Zahraj, on the other hand, has demonstrated a slightly lesser performance, preserving 57.86% of breakpoints. This statistica lends valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.

An overview of their overall performance in the past year illustrates Kachmazov's success in winning 55.22% of their matches (with a win/loss record of 37/30), while Zahraj boasts a slightly superior record of 58.23% (with a win/loss record of 46/33). This comprehensive overview informs us of the head-to-head prediction.

Examining their track records on various surfaces, Kachmazov excels on I.hard courts, achieving a remarkable 68% success rate (with a win/loss record of 83/39). Conversely, their performance wavers on clay, registering a modest 49% win rate (with a win/loss record of 27/28). Zahraj's area of expertise lies on I.hard surfaces, commanding a 65% win rate (with a win/loss record of 33/18), while their proficiency on hard courts yields a 53% win rate (with a win/loss record of 19/17).

Delving into their respective player levels, Kachmazov has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K category over the past year, securing victories in 53.19% of their matches (with a win/loss record of 25/22). Conversely, Zahraj has predominantly competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K category, claiming triumph in 56.52% of their matches (with a win/loss record of 26/20). When comparing these statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative event level at which they have competed.

An analysis of opponent quality statistics reveals that in the last 12 months, Kachmazov has confronted opponents with an average rank of 264.6. In contrast, Zahraj's opponents have possessed an average rank of 430.3, denoting a greater level of difficulty.

When it comes to deciding sets, an intriguing picture emerges. Over the past year, Kachmazov has emerged victorious in 50% of deciding sets, while Zahraj boasts an impressive 71% success rate in all matches played on tour. These statistics offer valuable insight for live predictions and betting purposes.

While past player performance undeniably aids in predicting tennis matches, current event statistics must not be overlooked. The performance of players during the ongoing event can provide invaluable indications of their form. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the section below (eventStats) to gather information on their performance in the current event. Additionally, the fact that certain players tend to excel at specific events should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.

Break point conversion rates primarily determine success in recent matches. Kachmazov has successfully converted 38.33% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Zahraj has capitalized on 43.22% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics assume particular significance when considering in-game live betting tips, especially when players are presented with a breakpoint opportunity.

If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as a remarkable starting point (Warning: Reserved for the stat enthusiast).