Alexander Weis vs Kevin Edengren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Edengren has secured 43.83% of second serve points over the last six months, closely matched by Weis with 43.7%. Does this small difference offer any advantage? Not significantly, as both players are nearly equal in this statistic.
• Return Game Success: Weis holds an edge in recent return stats, winning 46.91% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Edengren's 42.2%. Similarly, in receiving first serves, Weis has outperformed with a 30.25% success rate against Edengren's 27.97%.
• Break Point Resilience: Guiding the pressure game, Weis saves breakpoints better at 54.96% compared to Edengren's rate of 49.14%.
• Match Win Percentage: Over the past year, Edengren has won 67.65% of matches played, surpassing Weis who has a win rate of 56.72%.
• Best and Worst Surfaces: Both Edengren and Weis excel on clay, with Edengren at a 62% career win rate and Weis at 57%. Edengren is less effective on hard courts (31% win rate), while Weis struggles most on indoor hard courts, with only a 13% win rate.
• Competitive Level: Edengren and Weis have both mainly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Edengren holding a slight edge in win percentage at 67.65% compared to Weis's 62.5%.
• Opponent Quality: Edengren has faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 29.12, whereas Weis's average opponent ranks 449.54.
• Deciding Set Performance: Edengren prevails in high-pressure situations, winning 63% of deciding sets compared to Weis's 48% over the last year.
• Break Point Conversion: Weis is superior in recent break point conversion, converting 40.1% of opportunities compared to Edengren's 35.29%, indicating an advantage when breaking serve.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

As we assess the upcoming match, statistical insights paint a picture of two dynamically skilled players. Edengren’s consistency in winning matches and thriving under pressure distinguishes their gameplay, especially in deciding set scenarios.

However, Weis shines in converting break point opportunities and excels in return games, both of which are critical metrics for gaining valuable points during match play. Additionally, Weis displays superior breakpoint defense, indicating their strength under pressure.

Examining the level of opponents faced, Edengren appears more battle-tested, encountering players of a higher average rank. Nonetheless, Weis’s incremental edge in return statistics cannot be underestimated in determining match success.

Based on these compiled statistics and current performance patterns, Weis emerges slightly favored to win this match due to their return game efficiency and stronger in-game conversion statistics.