Alessandra Mazzola vs Angelica Raggi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Raggi has shown slightly better performance in winning points on their second serve compared to Mazzola, with percentages of 38.27% and 34.08% respectively. Could this give Raggi an edge? It suggests a minor advantage.
• When it comes to returning their opponent's second serve, Mazzola excels over Raggi, winning 56.28% compared to Raggi's 49.89%. Does this indicate a stronger return game for Mazzola? Yes, especially in second serve returns.
• For first serve returns, both players are fairly close, with Mazzola holding a slight lead at 39.18% versus Raggi's 36.13%. This suggests Mazzola is slightly more proficient in this area as well.
• Under pressure, Raggi has had marginally more success in saving breakpoints at 47.69% compared to Mazzola's 46.42%, hinting at a slightly higher resilience under pressure.
• Overall performance over the last year shows Mazzola with a better win rate of 65.15% against Raggi's 55.1%. Does Mazzola's higher win rate suggest they are in better form? Yes, it indicates a stronger record.
• Surface preference could play a role: Raggi is stronger on Hard courts with a 64% win rate, while Mazzola performs better on Indoor Hard courts with 67%.
• Level of competition varies, with Raggi facing slightly higher-ranked opponents on average. Could this experience with tougher opponents give Raggi an advantage? It could potentially be a factor.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Raggi might be favored, having a better success rate of 44% in such scenarios compared to Mazzola's 33%.
• Regarding breakpoint conversion, Mazzola exhibits higher proficiency with 51.11% compared to Raggi's 44.07%, indicating effective exploitation of opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 26, 2025, UTC):

As they head into this match, Raggi and Mazzola each bring distinct strengths to the court. Raggi displays slightly better second serve performance, with a small edge in breakpoint saving under pressure. This resilience can be crucial during critical match moments.

On the other hand, Mazzola’s superior return game, particularly on second serves, provides a strong counterbalance, suggesting he could capitalize on Raggi's service games. Additionally, Mazzola's higher overall win rate and better breakpoint conversion show his ability to seize control during key points in the match.

Given these factors, while both players present compelling cases, Mazzola’s comprehensive effectiveness in return games and higher win percentage over the past year make him the likely favorite to win the tournament match.