Alejandro Lopez Escribano vs Rudolf Molleker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Oct at 11:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Lopez Escribano vs R. Molleker

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Escribano 0 - 1 Molleker
They have played 2 sets in total, with Alejandro Lopez Escribano winning 0 and Rudolf Molleker winning 2. The last match between Rudolf Molleker and Alejandro Lopez Escribano was at the M25 Sintra, 31-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Rudolf Molleker getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Escribano | 0 |
| Molleker | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Sintra(10-31-25)
A. L. Escribano vs R. Molleker H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $334,440 |
| 47.73% (21-23) | Career Total W/L | 53.09% (266-235) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 7 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. L. Escribano vs R. Molleker Match Preview:
- In recent form, Rudolf Molleker has a slightly better second serve performance, winning 42.57% of points compared to Alejandro Lopez Escribano's 38.35%. Could this influence the match outcome? Likely, yes, as effective serving is crucial in tennis.
- When it comes to returning games, Alejandro has shown stronger performance. He has won 47.49% of second serve return points and 37.04% of first serve return points, superior to Rudolf's 43.27% and 25.11% respectively. Could this give Alejandro an edge? Possibly, especially if he capitalizes on breaks.
- Rudolf exhibits better composure under pressure, saving 54.36% of breakpoints compared to Alejandro's 37.61%. This skill might prove critical in pivotal moments of the match.
- Over the past year, Rudolf Molleker has a slightly better match win percentage at 55.00%, whereas Alejandro Lopez Escribano's is at 52.78%. How much does this difference impact the prediction? Marginally, yet it suggests Rudolf may be slightly more consistent.
- Considering surface preference, Rudolf's best performance is on clay with a 58% win rate, while Alejandro excels on hard courts with the same win percent. Does the surface matter for this match? Yes, surface type can heavily impact outcomes.
- Rudolf has mostly competed at the Challengers/ITF level with a 47.62% win rate, slightly less than Alejandro's 54.29% at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level. Does the tournament level affect player performance? Certainly, as it often indicates the level of competition faced.
- Regarding opponent quality, Alejandro's rivals had a higher average rank (231.28) than Rudolf's (358.57). Might this influence the result? Possibly, as facing tougher opponents can refine a player's skills.
- In deciding sets, Rudolf has a better record, winning 57% of such sets in the last year, compared to Alejandro's 43%. Could this be decisive if the match extends to this point? It might be, indicating Rudolf's ability to handle high pressure well.
Editorial Prediction (October 31, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their recent performances, Rudolf Molleker demonstrates a slight advantage in second serve effectiveness and overall match win percentage. His ability to save breakpoints under pressure also points to a potential edge in crucial game moments.
Although Alejandro Lopez Escribano shows a stronger return game, particularly on first serves, and has faced higher-ranked opponents recently, these factors may not sufficiently offset Rudolf's composure and consistency, especially on crucial points.
Considering the details of both players' strengths and statistical patterns, Rudolf Molleker is most likely to win the upcoming match, given his comprehensive advantages over Alejandro across several key performance areas.
Alejandro Lopez Escribano vs Rudolf Molleker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. L. Escribano vs R. Molleker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:9:46 | Average Match Time | 1:9:46 |
| 70% (33/47) | 1st Serve % | 69% (31/45) |
| 48% (16/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (22/31) |
| 7% (1/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (8/14) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (6/8) |
| 33% (15/45) | Return Points Win % | 64% (30/47) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. L. Escribano Recent Matches Played
R. Molleker Recent Matches Played

A. L. Escribano vs R. Molleker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.73% (21/23) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.09% (266/235) |
| 48.96% (47/49) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.44% (613/556) |
| 50.46% (437/429) | Games Win/Loss | 50.93% (5713/5504) |
| 48.72% (19/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.77% (29/33) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.16% (196/141) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.76% (38/53) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
| 5 | Aces Total | 2452 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 72 | Total Double Faults | 1507 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:30:5 |
| 80 | Average Opponent Rank | 500.14 |
| 71% (847/1194) | 1st Serve % | 60% (20356/34065) |
| 56% (471/847) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14319/20356) |
| 37% (128/347) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6915/13709) |
| 45% (64/142) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1274/2931) |
| 44% (537/1234) | Return Points Win % | 38% (12692/33597) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 47.06% (8/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 30.77% (12/27) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 48.34% (131/140) |
| 51.22% (21/20) | Futures W/L | 66.09% (115/59) |
| 48% (21/44) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (264/494) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 43% (3/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (77/165) |
| 38% (3/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (85/164) |
| 87% (23/20) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (270/225) |
| 13% (23/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (270/45) |
| 5% (21/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (231/40) |