Alana Subasic vs Kateryna Lazarenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Lazarenko has outperformed Subasic in second serve points, winning 36.28% compared to Subasic's 35.2%. Could this slight edge impact the match outcome? Likely, as it aligns closely with match prediction accuracy.
• Return Game Efficiency: Lazarenko and Subasic show comparable stats in returning opponents' second serves, with Lazarenko at 54.11% and Subasic slightly higher at 55.01%. However, when returning first serves, Subasic holds a significant edge, leading Lazarenko by close to 6%.
• Under Pressure Analysis: Lazarenko has been more resilient in saving breakpoints recently, with a rate of 50.16%, compared to Subasic's 43.9%. Is this a critical advantage? Yes, it could significantly influence critical match moments.
• Overall Performance: During the past year, Lazarenko boasts a higher match win rate at 69.23% versus Subasic's 56.52%, indicating a stronger overall performance.
• Preferred Surface: Both players struggle on clay, but Lazarenko excels indoors on hard surfaces with a 75% win rate, while Subasic performs best on standard hard courts with a 58% win rate.
• Player Level and Event Participation: Both competitors have shown similar success in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Lazarenko and Subasic achieving win rates of 70% and 70.59%, respectively.
• Opponent Quality: Lazarenko has faced less challenging opponents, with an average rank of 408.33, whereas Subasic's opponents have had a higher average rank of 365.78 over the past year.
• Deciding Set Performance: Lazarenko excels in deciding sets with a 78% win rate, while Subasic trails considerably, winning only 33% of such sets.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Subasic leads slightly in breakpoint conversion with 37.13% over Lazarenko's 35.9%, suggesting a minor advantage during pivotal game moments.

Editorial Prediction (September 6, 2025, UTC):

Lazarenko's second serve performance and resilience under pressure are apparent advantages, which could play pivotal roles in the outcome of the match against Subasic. Their ability to save breakpoints more effectively could provide an edge in crucial situations.

Subasic, on the other hand, appears stronger in first serve returns and has a marginally better opponent quality record. Yet, Lazarenko's impressive track record in deciding sets poses a substantial challenge for Subasic, particularly if the match is closely contested.

Considering these factors, alongside Lazarenko's superior overall win rate over the past year and favorable surface performance, Lazarenko seems poised to emerge as the likely victor in this encounter.