Aishi Das vs Nithesa Selvaraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 01:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Das vs N. Selvaraj

NZL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Das 1 - 0 Selvaraj
They have played 2 sets in total, with Aishi Das winning 2 and Nithesa Selvaraj winning 0. The last match between Aishi Das and Nithesa Selvaraj was at the W15 Tweed Heads, 13-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Aishi Das getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Das | 1 |
| Selvaraj | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Tweed Heads(08-13-25)
A. Das vs N. Selvaraj H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.00% (14-11) | Career Total W/L | 61.11% (11-7) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Das vs N. Selvaraj Match Preview:
- Das has recently won 37.5% of points on their second serve compared to Selvaraj's 38.3%. Is the slight edge significant? Possibly, given its high correlation with match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning the opponent's second serve, Das has claimed 50% while Selvaraj has a slight advantage at 52.83%. Does this indicate better return skills for Selvaraj? It suggests so.
- For first serve returns, Das outperforms Selvaraj with 46.02% versus 37.14%. Could this give Das a rebound advantage? Likely, yes.
- Looking at breakpoints, Das saves 47.5%, whereas Selvaraj has a higher rate at 50%. Can Selvaraj's consistency under pressure be an advantage? Certainly, it might.
- Over the past year, Das has a win rate of 64.29% compared to Selvaraj's 80%. Does this demonstrate Selvaraj's stronger momentum? It is indicative.
- On their best surface, Selvaraj has a 69% win rate on hard courts, surpassing Das's 57%. Will the surface influence Selvaraj's performance? It's a distinct possibility.
- When considering match levels, both play largely in $10K tournaments, with Selvaraj winning 80% and Das 75%. Does this make their experience comparable? Relatively so.
- Das has faced opponents averaging a rank of 247.36, while Selvaraj's opponents' rank is not recorded, marking a potential difference in competition level.
- In deciding sets, Das has won 50% in contrast to Selvaraj's 0%. Might this factor in late-match scenarios? Absolutely, it gives Das a resilience edge.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Das excels at 52%, with Selvaraj at 35%. Is Das more opportunistic on breaks? This data suggests yes.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming tennis match between Das and Selvaraj, several performance metrics point to distinct advantages for both players.
While Selvaraj holds a slight edge in recent form second serve performance and returning second serves, Das demonstrates superior first serve return rates and breakpoint conversion success.
Selvaraj's greater year-long match win percentage indicates impressive form, but Das's experience with higher-ranked players and proficiency in deciding sets may prove crucial.
Considering these factors, particularly the strong surface performance and consistency under pressure, Selvaraj appears to have a slight overall edge and is more likely to secure victory in this encounter.
Aishi Das vs Nithesa Selvaraj Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Das vs N. Selvaraj H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1:47:44 | Average Match Time | 1:47:44 |
| 63% (15/24) | 1st Serve % | 85% (17/20) |
| 80% (12/15) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 89% (8/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (10/20) | Return Points Win % | 17% (4/24) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Das Recent Matches Played
N. Selvaraj Recent Matches Played

A. Das vs N. Selvaraj Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.00% (14/11) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.11% (11/7) |
| 53.85% (28/24) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.16% (24/14) |
| 51.01% (228/219) | Games Win/Loss | 57.94% (186/135) |
| 56.00% (14/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.71% (11/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 7 | Aces Total | 1 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 86 | Total Double Faults | 22 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 259.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 201.11 |
| 55% (443/807) | 1st Serve % | 66% (374/567) |
| 54% (239/443) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (216/374) |
| 41% (148/364) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (86/193) |
| 50% (63/126) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (48/90) |
| 51% (418/816) | Return Points Win % | 52% (285/544) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 62.50% (10/6) | Futures W/L | 69.23% (9/4) |
| 54% (13/24) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (11/18) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 93% (14/13) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (13/11) |
| 7% (14/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (13/2) |
| 9% (11/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (5/0) |