Adrien Gobat vs Kevin Edengren Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Gobat's second serve performance has been slightly superior, winning 48.92% of points compared to Edengren's 44.44%. Does this provide Gobat with an edge? It certainly suggests a slight advantage.
• In return games, Gobat is also ahead in capturing 45.11% of their opponent's second serve points as opposed to Edengren's 42.47%. Although, for first serve returns, Edengren surpasses Gobat with 27.99% to Gobat's 25.94%.
• Under pressure, Gobat excels by saving 58.54% of breakpoints, outshining Edengren's 50%. This resilience could be significant in tightly contested moments.
• Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Edengren has a superior win rate (69.7%) compared to Gobat (60.71%). Does this mean Edengren is more likely to win? It points in that direction, based on consistency.
• Surface preference might play a crucial role. Gobat thrives on Hard courts with a 65% win rate, whereas Edengren performs best on Clay with a win rate of 63%. However, Edengren struggles on Hard courts, winning only 31% of matches.
• In terms of player level, both have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments. Edengren has had a slightly better performance with a 69.7% win rate.
• Edengren has been facing tougher opponents, with an average rank of 149.91 compared to Gobat's 335.43. Does this experience against higher-ranked players favor Edengren? It often does.
• In deciding sets, Edengren again leads with a 63% win rate, while Gobat has won 56% of such matches.
• Edengren has been more efficient in converting breakpoints, doing so 35.29% of the time against Gobat's 28.15%.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match approaches, both players exhibit distinct skills and attributes. Gobat holds a slight edge in second serve success as well as saving breakpoints, indicating proficiency in crucial scenarios.

However, Edengren’s overall match performance and capacity to face higher-ranked opponents suggest a stronger consistency. Furthermore, Edengren’s superior efficiency at breakpoint conversion and deciding sets could be pivotal.

Considering the surface impact, Edengren's struggles on Hard courts provide Gobat with an advantage, given Gobat's comfort and success on such surfaces.

Taking into account all the comparisons and stats, while Gobat has specific standout strengths, the prediction leans towards Edengren as the more likely victor due to their comprehensive competitive edge, especially if matching conditions align with Edengren's strengths.