Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adrien Bossel vs Filip Brtnicky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bossel vs Brtnicky analysis and find out who is favored!
Adrien Bossel vs Filip Brtnicky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bossel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Brtnicky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bossel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brtnicky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bossel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brtnicky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bossel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brtnicky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bossel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 115/ 78), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 71/ 74). Brtnicky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 87/ 65), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bossel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bossel winning 2 and Brtnicky winning 0. The last match between Bossel and Brtnicky was at the Czech Republic F3 (Jablonec Nad Nisou), 01-06-2017, Second, Clay with Adrien Bossel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bossel and Brtnicky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bossel winning 0 times and Brtnicky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bossel winning 0, and Brtnicky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bossel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brtnicky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bossel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brtnicky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bossel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brtnicky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bossel 1 - 0 Brtnicky
Ret.
Rank
262
High
37
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
792
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
55% (381-314)
Career Total W/L
55% (104-86)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$18,115
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Adrien Bossel | Filip Brtnicky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (24/48) | 71% (39/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (19/24) | 69% (27/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 79% (19/24) | 31% (5/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (23/55) | 21% (10/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Adrien Bossel
Player
Filip Brtnicky
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adrien Bossel | Filip Brtnicky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Adrien Bossel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Adrien Bossel
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
13
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Mirko Martinez
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Nik Razborsek
Player
Adrien Bossel
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
72)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
27 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Anis Ghorbel
42%
(
38 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Harri Heliovaara
Player
Adrien Bossel
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Bax
Player
Adrien Bossel
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
43%
(
37 of
86)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Brtnicky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-6 6-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Filip Brtnicky
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Brtnicky
Player
Marek Jaloviec
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Musialek
Player
Filip Brtnicky
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Bossel Vs Brtnicky Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
