Adrian Oetzbach vs Mikail Alimli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 09:01 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Oetzbach vs M. Alimli

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Oetzbach 1 - 0 Alimli
They have played 2 sets in total, with Adrian Oetzbach winning 2 and Mikail Alimli winning 0. The last match between Adrian Oetzbach and Mikail Alimli was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Adrian Oetzbach getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oetzbach | 1 |
| Alimli | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sarreguemines(10-22-25)
A. Oetzbach vs M. Alimli H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.14% (279-227) | Career Total W/L | 46.70% (92-105) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Oetzbach vs M. Alimli Match Preview:
- In recent months, Adrian Oetzbach shows slightly superior second serve success at 42.38%, marginally overshadowing Mikail Alimli's 41.62%. Will this edge transform into on-court dominance?
- Both players exhibit comparable abilities in second serve returns, with Oetzbach at 42.91% and Alimli at 41.81%, but how does this translate to first serve return effectiveness? Oetzbach outshines significantly with 30.68% compared to Alimli's 21.03%.
- When under pressure, does Oetzbach's record of saving 52.83% of breakpoints give him a notable advantage over Alimli's 42.53%?
- Long-term performance insights reveal Oetzbach has a higher match win rate over the past year (56.41%) compared to Alimli (41.67%), suggesting more consistent outcomes.
- Considering surface preferences, both players excel on hard courts, winning 58%. Does this shared strength level their competition on this surface?
- Oetzbach has faced tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 371.03, contrasted with Alimli's 36.31. How might this experience against stronger competitors affect match dynamics?
- In deciding sets, Oetzbach is slightly more successful, winning 58% compared to Alimli's 56%, potentially tipping the scales in a closely contested match.
- While historical performance is crucial, current event statistics should also be reviewed if available, as players can perform differently across events.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Adrian Oetzbach enters the match with a slight statistical advantage in several key areas. His consistency in second serve performance and return game primes him for a competitive edge.
Oetzbach's improved breakpoint resilience and familiarity playing against higher-ranked opponents underscore his tactical prowess and adaptability under pressure.
While both players have equal success on hard courts, Oetzbach's higher overall win rate and proficiency in deciding sets suggest a solid ability to close matches effectively.
Based on the data and trends, Adrian Oetzbach is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Adrian Oetzbach vs Mikail Alimli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Oetzbach vs M. Alimli H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:35:7 | Average Match Time | 1:35:7 |
| 82% (55/67) | 1st Serve % | 48% (30/62) |
| 73% (40/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (24/30) |
| 50% (6/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (15/32) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 37% (23/62) | Return Points Win % | 31% (21/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Oetzbach Recent Matches Played
M. Alimli Recent Matches Played

A. Oetzbach vs M. Alimli Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.14% (279/227) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.70% (92/105) |
| 54.22% (623/526) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.47% (204/235) |
| 52.23% (5646/5164) | Games Win/Loss | 48.92% (2046/2136) |
| 57.81% (74/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 56.36% (186/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.86% (36/50) |
| 40.43% (19/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (24/24) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 796 | Aces Total | 458 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1123 | Total Double Faults | 335 |
| 1:12:14 | Average Match Time | 1:1:53 |
| 358.57 | Average Opponent Rank | 260.61 |
| 63% (13752/21988) | 1st Serve % | 55% (4383/8035) |
| 65% (8949/13752) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2983/4383) |
| 48% (3944/8235) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1741/3651) |
| 42% (1024/2421) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (301/720) |
| 42% (9344/22422) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2985/7816) |
| 33.33% (11/22) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 56.66% (268/205) | Futures W/L | 47.40% (91/101) |
| 55% (274/499) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (89/193) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (51/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (20/43) |
| 51% (73/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (26/49) |
| 87% (277/240) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (85/72) |
| 13% (277/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (85/13) |
| 17% (229/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (112/20) |