Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adam Chadaj vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chadaj vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Adam Chadaj vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chadaj has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 50.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chadaj, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 53.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chadaj has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chadaj has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Michalski winning 58.06% (W/L 36/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chadaj has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 96/ 65), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chadaj winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chadaj winning 2 and Michalski winning 0. The last match between Chadaj and Michalski was at the Poland F6 (Mragowo), 20-07-2017, Second, Clay with Adam Chadaj getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chadaj and Michalski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chadaj winning 0 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chadaj winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chadaj has played against opponents with an average rank of while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 237.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chadaj has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chadaj has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 43.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chadaj 1 - 0 Michalski
Ret.
Rank
202
High
39
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
318
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
59% (349-246)
Career Total W/L
62% (212-128)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$19,360
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Adam Chadaj | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (46/63) | 62% (38/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (34/46) | 61% (23/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (9/17) | 35% (8/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (30/61) | 32% (20/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Adam Chadaj
Player
Daniel Michalski
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adam Chadaj | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (27/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (250/252) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 322.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1048/1680) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (661/1048) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (322/632) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (70/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (654/1605) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Adam Chadaj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Piotr Matuszewski
Player
Adam Chadaj
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
0%
(
0 of
0)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
4
Total Points Won
2
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dante Gennaro
Player
Adam Chadaj
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Adam Chadaj
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Torebko
Player
Adam Chadaj
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
2
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dante Gennaro
Player
Adam Chadaj
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Chadaj
Player
Luca George Tatomir
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
0
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Chadaj
Player
George Tsivadze
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Adam Chadaj
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
15
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francois-Arthur Vibert
Player
Adam Chadaj
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavel Filin
Player
Adam Chadaj
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
86)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Chadaj Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
