Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Aaron Schmid vs Anirudh Chandrasekar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmid vs Chandrasekar analysis and find out who is favored!
Aaron Schmid vs Anirudh Chandrasekar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmid has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chandrasekar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmid, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chandrasekar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmid has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chandrasekar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmid has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chandrasekar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmid has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 44/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 22/ 27). Chandrasekar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 40/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schmid winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schmid winning 2 and Chandrasekar winning 0. The last match between Schmid and Chandrasekar was at the Zimbabwe F1 (Harare), 30-05-2018, Second, Hard with Aaron Schmid getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmid and Chandrasekar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schmid winning 0 times and Chandrasekar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schmid winning 0, and Chandrasekar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmid has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chandrasekar has played against players with an average rank of 311.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmid has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chandrasekar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmid has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chandrasekar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmid 1 - 0 Chandrasekar
Ret.
Rank
870
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
55% (66-53)
Career Total W/L
43% (76-102)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schmid VS Chandrasekar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Aaron Schmid | Anirudh Chandrasekar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:0 | 1:42:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (32/54) | 54% (38/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (26/32) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 52% (17/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/71) | 28% (15/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Schmid VS Chandrasekar H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Aaron Schmid
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Aaron Schmid | Anirudh Chandrasekar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aaron Schmid Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Aaron Schmid
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bastian Malla
Player
Aaron Schmid
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aaron Schmid
Player
Joao Hinsching
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
28 of
38)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
47
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Aaron Schmid
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Aaron Schmid
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aaron Schmid
Player
Ren Nakamura
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Aaron Schmid
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aaron Schmid
Player
Ryota Tanuma
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
72%
(
75 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
45 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aaron Schmid
Player
Ray Ho
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aaron Schmid
Player
Sung Jun Park
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Anirudh Chandrasekar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Digvijaypratap Singh
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karunuday Singh
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Schmid Vs Chandrasekar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
