Ethan Quinn vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
Wojtek Kolan
Publicado el 23 Jun at 04:05 PM UTC
CARA A CARA
E. Quinn vs C. Ugo Carabelli

USA
2
Ganar
Jugó
0
Ganar

ARG
2
Ganar
Jugó
0
Ganar
H2H: Quinn 2 - 0 Carabelli
Ellas han jugado 5 conjuntos en total, con Ethan Quinn victoriosa 4 y Camilo Ugo Carabelli victoriosa 1. El último partido entre Ethan Quinn y Camilo Ugo Carabelli fue en el Mallorca Championships - Mallorca, el 23-06-2025, Cuartos de R1, Superficie: Grass, con Ethan Quinn obteniendo la victoria 6-3 6-2
| Jugadores | Victorias en partidos cara a cara |
|---|---|
| Quinn | 2 |
| Carabelli | 0 |
Últimos 2 cara a cara:
(R1) Mallorca Championships - Mallorca(06-23-25)
(Q3) Miami Open - Miami(03-18-25)
E. Quinn vs C. U. Carabelli Perfil H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dura | 0 |
| 41.38% (12-17) | Ganados/Perdidos | 42.86% (18-24) |
| 1 | Hierba | 0 |
| $769,415 | Premios de la Carrera | $595,100 |
| 4 | Títulos | 12 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 57.96% (131-95) | Total Carrera G/P | 62.44% (379-228) |
E. Quinn Vs C. U. Carabelli Vista previa del partido:
- In recent months, Quinn has achieved a higher second serve win rate (48.21%) compared to Carabelli (44.69%). How does this correlate with match predictions? It suggests an edge for Quinn.
- Carabelli has been more effective in return games, securing 48.25% of second serve return points compared to 46.75% for Quinn.
- Both players demonstrate varying strengths under pressure, with Quinn having a slight advantage in saving break points (56.63% over Carabelli's 54.16%).
- Over the past year, Carabelli holds a marginally better win rate (63.41%) than Quinn (60%).
- Carabelli excels on clay with a 65% win rate, while Quinn's best surface is indoor hard courts (61% win rate).
- In terms of match level, Carabelli's performance in Challengers/ITF > $10K is stronger at 78.26%, whereas Quinn stands at 58.97%.
- In their direct encounters, Quinn has a 1-0 advantage over Carabelli, winning 2 out of 3 total sets played.
- In tight match conditions, Quinn has performed better in tie-breaks, winning the only one they've contested.
- Carabelli faces slightly higher-ranked opponents (average ranking 181.16) compared to Quinn (184.43).
- If this match goes to a deciding set, Carabelli's high winning percentage (72%) in such situations could be decisive.
- Both players' break point conversion rates hint at different strategic edges, with Carabelli converting 35.89% of his opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
With Carabelli currently excelling in return games but Quinn boasting superior second serve performance, this match presents a tight competition. Both players display different strengths, with Carabelli performing notably well in clay events and decisive set situations.
Quinn's historical success against Carabelli, his recent second serve effectiveness, and ability to manage pressure might give him a slight edge. However, Carabelli's tenacity on decisive points and higher average opponent ranking could be pivotal if the match extends.
While Carabelli's greater efficiency in converting break points adds to his potential strengths, Quinn's overall consistency under pressure may have the final say.
Aunque Carabelli tiene una ventaja en la conversión de puntos decisivos, es probable que Ethan Quinn salga victorioso en el próximo partido de tenis.
Ethan Quinn vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Estadísticas H2H de E. Quinn vs C. U. Carabelli utilizadas en nuestras predicciones
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Ganados | 1 |
| 28 | Juegos Ganados | 19 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 4 | Faltas dobles totales | 7 |
| 1:32:56 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:32:56 |
| 61% (86/141) | % De Primer Servicio | 60% (81/136) |
| 74% (64/86) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 68% (55/81) |
| 65% (36/55) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 58% (32/55) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 36% (49/136) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 29% (41/141) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Decidir establecer % de ganancia | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (0/2) |
Estadísticas de Rendimiento Reciente
Partidos recientes jugados por E. Quinn
Partidos recientes jugados por C. U. Carabelli

Desglose de estadísticas de E. Quinn vs C. U. Carabelli frente a todos los rivales H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.96% (131/95) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.44% (379/228) |
| 54.78% (298/246) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.23% (831/572) |
| 51.67% (2796/2615) | Games Win/Loss | 53.60% (6960/6025) |
| 58.46% (76/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.68% (37/36) |
| 52.78% (19/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.95% (341/184) |
| 61.22% (30/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 54.55% (6/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 0.45 | Ases por juego | 0.18 |
| 1193 | Aces Totales | 1141 |
| 0.24 | DFs Por Juego | 0.21 |
| 647 | Faltas dobles totales | 1352 |
| 1:48:35 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:41:30 |
| 311.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 372.1 |
| 60% (10087/16816) | % De Primer Servicio | 62% (24433/39475) |
| 71% (7183/10087) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 66% (16194/24433) |
| 51% (3415/6729) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 50% (7452/15041) |
| 40% (597/1495) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 45% (2057/4574) |
| 38% (6374/16737) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 43% (17106/40023) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Slam W/L | 36.36% (8/14) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Masters W/L | 40.91% (9/13) |
| 48.72% (19/20) | Main Tour W/L | 47.27% (26/29) |
| 54.84% (51/42) | Challenger W/L | 65.52% (190/100) |
| 68.97% (40/18) | Futures W/L | 66.97% (146/72) |
| 59% (127/217) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 63% (367/580) |
| 43% (3/7) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 41% (7/17) |
| 58% (54/93) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 53% (82/155) |
| 59% (49/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (109/182) |
| 85% (124/106) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (349/310) |
| 15% (124/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (349/36) |
| 24% (102/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (257/67) |