Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zsombor Piros vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Piros vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Zsombor Piros vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Piros has won 52.25% of points on his second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Piros, in recent form, has won 48.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 49.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.38% and 31.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Piros has saved 62.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 70.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Piros has won 61.64% of matches played (W/L 45/ 28), with Nakashima winning 59.46% (W/L 44/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Piros has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 7/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 41/ 36). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 20/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Piros has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.41% of matches (W/L 38/ 21), where as Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 27/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Piros winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Piros winning 0 and Nakashima winning 2. The last match between Piros and Nakashima was at the Brest Challenger, 26-10-2021, First, I.hard with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Piros and Nakashima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Piros winning 0 times and Nakashima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Piros winning 0, and Nakashima 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Piros has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.05 while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 235.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Piros has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Piros has converted 40.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 35.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Piros 0 - 1 Nakashima
122
Rank
106
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
87
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
64% (254-146)
Career Total W/L
62% (184-115)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
74% (26-9)
$119,810
Career Prize Money
$1,608,265
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zsombor Piros | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:48 | 1:32:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (48/80) | 64% (41/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (34/48) | 88% (36/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (14/32) | 61% (14/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 22% (14/64) | 40% (32/80) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Zsombor Piros
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zsombor Piros | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 74% (26/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (36/22) | 70% (53/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (303/251) | 55% (423/346) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 80% (4/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 88% (7/1) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.7 |
| Aces Total | 72 | 264 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:58 | 1:42:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 357.17 | 298.89 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1040/1664) | 65% (1548/2369) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (715/1040) | 76% (1169/1548) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (328/624) | 57% (472/821) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (82/203) | 33% (71/213) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (703/1713) | 37% (945/2541) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 79% (19/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 74% (25/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 75% (12/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 92% (24/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (17/4) | 8% (24/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Zsombor Piros Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Zsombor Piros
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Matej Dodig
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Filip Misolic
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Lukas Neumayer
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Zsombor Piros
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Zsombor Piros
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
90
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Zsombor Piros
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Andrey Rublev
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
13
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Terence Atmane
50%
(
4 of
8)
1st Serve %
43%
(
3 of
7)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
8
Total Points Won
7
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
8
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Piros Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
