G. M. Perricard
To Win
Z. Bergs
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W L L LForm
W L W W W W L W L LBergs | Stats | Nishioka |
---|---|---|
61% (19-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (9-6) |
0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
49 | Ranking | 75 |
49 | Highest Rank | 24 |
25 | Age | 29 |
R | Plays | L |
12 | Titles | 14 |
62% (323-197) | Career Total W/L | 61% (432-277) |
$1,107,740 | Career Prize Money | $4,117,544 |
25 May 2025 / First
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In recent times, a comparison of second serve performance reveals a slight edge for Nishioka, who has secured 47.43% of points on their second serve. Bergs trails closely behind with a 47.04% win rate in the same category, showcasing their competitive nature. This statistic is significantly influential in forecasting match outcomes.
When analyzing return game performance, Nishioka's recent form shows they have won 37.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bergs has outperformed with a 43.44% success rate. In terms of first serve returns, Nishioka has a 23.76% success rate compared to Bergs' slightly higher 24.04%, both these stats being crucial in determining the favorite between these players.
Under pressure, Nishioka has demonstrated an ability to save 60.19% of breakpoints, whereas Bergs has saved 58.21%. This aspect of the game is a valuable indicator, especially for in-game wagering predictions.
Reviewing performance over the last year, Bergs has shown a marginally superior match-winning rate, with 62.16% of matches won (W/L 46/28), compared to Nishioka's 60.78% (W/L 31/20). In terms of deciding sets, Bergs has proven formidable by winning 57% of such encounters, surpassing Nishioka's 50% win rate.
Surface preference also plays a role in predicting match outcomes. Nishioka's best career surface is indoor hard courts, with a winning percentage of 64% (W/L 63/35), while struggling on grass with 45% (W/L 13/16). Conversely, Bergs excels on grass, boasting a 68% win rate (W/L 19/9), and finds clay courts more challenging with a winning rate of 62% (W/L 121/75).
In the past year, both players have participated primarily on the main tour, with Nishioka claiming victory in 72% of his matches (W/L 18/7), compared to Bergs' 64.1% success rate (W/L 25/14). This indicates a relative evaluation based on the event level they have competed in.
When assessing opponent quality, Nishioka has faced competitors with an average rank of 137, while Bergs has squared off against those averaging a rank of 136.23. Breakpoint conversion rates for predicting live betting results are close, with Nishioka converting 38.46% of opportunities and Bergs converting slightly less at 36.69%.
Taking into account all these metrics and comparisons, Bergs appears to hold a slight advantage over Nishioka. Hence, based on current statistical analysis, Bergs is predicted to have the upper hand in their upcoming match.
Bergs vs Nishioka Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Zizou Bergs
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Zizou Bergs
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Zizou Bergs
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Zizou Bergs
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Zizou Bergs
Player
Alexander Bublik
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
114)
6
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Zizou Bergs
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Zizou Bergs
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Zizou Bergs
Player
Andrey Rublev
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Hugo Gaston
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Casper Ruud
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Frances Tiafoe
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Rubber 4 | 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (323/197) | Win/Loss | 61% (432/277) |
60% (736/496) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (973/752) |
54% (6300/5461) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8318/7777) |
63% (90/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (243/153) |
61% (121/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (104/70) |
62% (93/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (72/38) |
68% (19/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (13/16) |
0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
2399 | Aces Total | 1171 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
1077 | Total Double Faults | 1013 |
1:36:34 | Average Match Time | 1:25:35 |
384.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 437.22 |
65% (21953/33723) | 1st Serve % | 64% (28014/43805) |
70% (15464/21953) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (18438/28014) |
52% (6176/11770) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8410/15790) |
40% (1406/3534) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1856/4437) |
39% (13901/35213) | Return Points Win % | 39% (17310/43984) |
56% (19/15) | Slam W/L | 48% (35/38) |
43% (9/12) | Masters W/L | 52% (56/52) |
57% (8/6) | Cups W/L | 67% (14/7) |
50% (42/42) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (122/85) |
67% (119/58) | Challenger W/L | 65% (134/71) |
67% (126/63) | Futures W/L | 76% (71/23) |
63% (310/494) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (405/636) |
35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (25/63) |
54% (90/166) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (122/213) |
55% (95/174) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (153/227) |
87% (324/282) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (394/349) |
13% (324/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (394/40) |
22% (196/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (315/82) |