Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zizou Bergs vs Cyril Vandermeersch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bergs vs Vandermeersch analysis and find out who is favored!
Zizou Bergs vs Cyril Vandermeersch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bergs has won 51.45% of points on his second serve, while Vandermeersch has won 51.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bergs, in recent form, has won 51.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vandermeersch has won 50.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.93% and 33.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bergs has saved 61.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vandermeersch has saved 58.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bergs has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 46/ 24), with Vandermeersch winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 13/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 80/ 51). Vandermeersch has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 79/ 50), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.42% of matches (W/L 32/ 11), where as Vandermeersch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.78% of matches (W/L 31/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bergs winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bergs winning 2 and Vandermeersch winning 0. The last match between Bergs and Vandermeersch was at the Lille Challenger, 21-03-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with Zizou Bergs getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bergs and Vandermeersch have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bergs winning 0 times and Vandermeersch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bergs winning 0, and Vandermeersch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bergs has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.79 while Vandermeersch has played against players with an average rank of 123.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bergs has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vandermeersch has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bergs has converted 41.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vandermeersch has converted 43.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bergs 1 - 0 Vandermeersch
103
Rank
103
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
727
Rank
670
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
63% (277-166)
Career Total W/L
57% (93-71)
67% (20-10)
YTD W/L
55% (11-9)
$293,475
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bergs VS Vandermeersch H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Cyril Vandermeersch |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:45 | 1:9:45 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (32/48) | 62% (41/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 94% (30/32) | 73% (30/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 40% (10/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (26/66) | 15% (7/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Bergs VS Vandermeersch H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Zizou Bergs
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zizou Bergs | Cyril Vandermeersch |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (20/10) | 55% (11/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (46/27) | 54% (26/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (368/321) | 51% (245/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 75% (6/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 42% (5/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.66 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 223 | 60 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 90 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:11 | 2:1:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 286.6 | 199.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1320/2152) | 57% (872/1528) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (972/1320) | 70% (613/872) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (423/832) | 49% (322/656) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (85/215) | 41% (62/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (847/2156) | 40% (617/1553) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (12/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (10/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (19/27) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (23/18) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (23/5) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 11% (9/1) |
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Gerald Melzer
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Zizou Bergs
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Kaylan Bigun
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Oliver Crawford
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cyril Vandermeersch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Nicolas Colne
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Simon Beaupain
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
77%
(
91 of
118)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
3
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
59 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
118
Total Points Won
119
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Michael Zhu
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Andrea Bolla
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fabrizio Andaloro
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Jack Loge
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bergs Vs Vandermeersch Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Zizou Bergs
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
