P. Udvardy
To Win
V. Lepchenko
To Win
Zhibek Kulambayeva vs Panna Udvardy Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L W L
Form
L W L W W L W W L LH2H: Kulambayeva 1 - 0 Udvardy
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kulambayeva winning 2 and Udvardy winning 0. The last match between Kulambayeva and Udvardy was at the W75 Szekesfehervar, 12-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Zhibek Kulambayeva getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zhibek Kulambayeva | 1 |
| Panna Udvardy | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Szekesfehervar(12-03-2025)
6
1
7
5
| Kulambayeva | Stats | Udvardy |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (17-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 313 | Ranking | 143 |
| 309 | Highest Rank | 76 |
| 25 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 12 |
| 55% (226-185) | Career Total W/L | 59% (305-216) |
| $2,140 | Career Prize Money | $257,712 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
12 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Moutet PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Raducanu PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kulambayeva VS Udvardy H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Panna Udvardy
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
39%
(
28 of
71)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Kulambayeva VS Udvardy H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:44:37 | Average Match Time | 1:44:37 |
| 78% (52/67) | 1st Serve % | 39% (28/71) |
| 54% (28/52) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (17/28) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (15/43) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 55% (39/71) | Return Points Win % | 45% (30/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kulambayeva vs Udvardy Match Preview :
Analyzing second serve performance for both players in the past six months, Udvardy has managed to win 42.54% of points, while Kulambayeva's rate is at 36.32%. This particular statistic offers significant insight into the accuracy of match predictions. In contrast, on return game statistics during the same timeframe, Kulambayeva demonstrates a higher success rate, capturing 55.51% of points on her opponent's second serve compared to Udvardy's 49.72%. First serve return success, another key indicator of potential performance in head-to-head encounters, shows Udvardy winning 28.62%, whereas Kulambayeva achieves a higher rate of 38.15%.
When evaluating player performance under pressure, specifically in saving breakpoints, Udvardy has a slight edge with a 51.32% save rate compared to Kulambayeva's 42.2%. This statistic proves invaluable for making informed in-game betting predictions. Over the last year, Udvardy's match win percentage stands at 62.69% (42 wins out of 67 matches), slightly lower than Kulambayeva's 62.86% (44 wins out of 70 matches), offering a head-to-head comparison in predicting outcomes.
Wanting to leverage surface preference, both players showcase their best performance on clay courts. Udvardy has a clay win percentage of 64% (230 wins), while Kulambayeva boasts 63% (150 wins). On indoor hard courts, their win percentages decline, with Udvardy at 44% and Kulambayeva at 39%. In terms of experience, Udvardy has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, yielding a 63.16% match win rate, compared to Kulambayeva's 60.34% for the same level of competition. The rank quality of their opponents over the past year further differentiates them, with Udvardy facing opponents with an average rank of 245.09 versus Kulambayeva's 431.11 average ranking.
Assessing the performance in deciding sets provides crucial insight for live match predictions. Over the last 12 months, Udvardy has succeeded in 62% of deciding sets, whereas Kulambayeva's performance is slightly superior at 69%. Breakpoint conversion rates in recent matches are another aspect hinting at potential outcomes, with Udvardy converting 31.72% and Kulambayeva achieving a more impressive 39.81% conversion. Though past tournament history aids in forming expectations, current event stats and player adaptability to specific competitions should not be overlooked when identifying the likely victor.
Upon comprehensive analysis, the statistics suggest a tight competition with Kulambayeva having a slight edge over Udvardy, particularly in return performance and deciding set success rates. Hence, based on the statistical comparison, Kulambayeva appears better positioned to secure victory in the upcoming matchup.
Zhibek Kulambayeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
59 of
75)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Qianhui Tang
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
68 of
91)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
47%
(
42 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Arina Bulatova
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Ana Filipa Santos
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
50
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Wushuang Zheng
71%
(
65 of
91)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
79)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(4) 6-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Alevtina Ibragimova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Panna Udvardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Panna Udvardy
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Panna Udvardy
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Jule Niemeier
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Olivia Gadecki
49%
(
57 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
125)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
53%
(
32 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
46 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
125)
129
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Panna Udvardy
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Alexandra Eala
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Lian Tran
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Panna Udvardy
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
52%
(
56 of
108)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Lisa Pigato
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Panna Udvardy
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (226/185) | Win/Loss | 59% (305/216) |
| 53% (497/435) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (676/511) |
| 51% (4377/4132) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5766/5097) |
| 44% (54/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (48/52) |
| 62% (159/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (238/140) |
| 39% (13/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (14/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 240 | Aces Total | 1097 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1411 | Total Double Faults | 1938 |
| 1:35:53 | Average Match Time | 1:30:56 |
| 505.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 442.99 |
| 68% (17231/25297) | 1st Serve % | 56% (18539/33246) |
| 57% (9835/17231) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (11788/18539) |
| 43% (3479/8066) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6778/14707) |
| 51% (1706/3325) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1995/4123) |
| 48% (12033/25023) | Return Points Win % | 46% (15236/32915) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 35% (8/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 17% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 27% (11/30) |
| 50% (97/97) | Challenger W/L | 62% (239/148) |
| 61% (128/83) | Futures W/L | 71% (42/17) |
| 54% (221/406) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (303/518) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (37/72) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (55/111) |
| 56% (63/113) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (80/148) |
| 85% (217/184) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (298/264) |
| 15% (217/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (298/34) |
| 21% (194/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (223/40) |
Kulambayeva vs. Udvardy Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
