Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zhe Li vs Matheus Cury Bueres Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Li vs Bueres analysis and find out who is favored!
Zhe Li vs Matheus Cury Bueres Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 60.44% of points on his second serve, while Bueres has won 46.81%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 46.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bueres has won 52.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.58% and 32.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bueres has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 70.27% of matches played (W/L 26/ 11), with Bueres winning 54.29% (W/L 19/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 434/ 302), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 7/ 17). Bueres has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 9/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 22/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.19% of matches (W/L 16/ 5), where as Bueres has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 19/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Li winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Bueres winning 0. The last match between Li and Bueres was at the M25 Monastir, 27-05-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Zhe Li getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Bueres have played a deciding set 0 times, with Li winning 0 times and Bueres 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Bueres 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 245.92 while Bueres has played against players with an average rank of 67.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bueres has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 52.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bueres has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Li 1 - 0 Bueres
513
Rank
193
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
57% (464-347)
Career Total W/L
47% (31-35)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$32,170
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zhe Li | Matheus Cury Bueres |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (32/49) | 58% (21/36) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (22/32) | 48% (10/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 76% (13/17) | 27% (4/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 61% (22/36) | 29% (14/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Zhe Li
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zhe Li | Matheus Cury Bueres |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (19/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (176/142) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 24 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 94 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 74% (364/491) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (218/364) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (60/127) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (24/58) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (220/511) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Zhe Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Zhe Li
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Tatsuma Ito
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Omni Kumar
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
17 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
16 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Zhe Li
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Jimmy Yang
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Piotr Matuszewski
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Zhe Li
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
19
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Xiaofei Wang
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Benjamin Lock
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
10
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matheus Cury Bueres Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Cury Bueres
Player
Adrian Emanuel Navarro
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Cury Bueres
Player
Tadeo Munua
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Valsecchi
Player
Matheus Cury Bueres
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
81%
(
59 of
73)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
79%
(
11 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Li Vs Bueres Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
