Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zane Khan vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Khan vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Zane Khan vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Khan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Broom has won 54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Khan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 54.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Khan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Khan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Broom winning 54.79% (W/L 40/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Khan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 57/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Khan winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Khan winning 4 and Broom winning 0. The last match between Khan and Broom was at the M15 Santo Domingo, 09-12-2020, Q3, Hard with Zane Khan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Khan and Broom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Khan winning 0 times and Broom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Khan winning 1, and Broom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Khan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 207.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Khan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Khan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 39.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Khan 2 - 0 Broom
Ret.
Rank
404
High
22
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
339
Rank
322
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
65% (62-34)
Career Total W/L
63% (196-116)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$2,555
Career Prize Money
$36,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zane Khan | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 7-6(6) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zane Khan | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (26/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (247/251) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 147 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:55:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 138.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (983/1559) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (695/983) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (308/576) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (52/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (649/1684) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 27% (11/3) |
Zane Khan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Zane Khan
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Zane Khan
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
46 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Damir Dzumhur
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Zane Khan
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
2)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
6
Total Points Won
0
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Takuto Niki
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Pedro Araujo
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Zane Khan
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Khan Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
