Zandrix Acob vs Gilad Tamar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Acob vs Tamar analysis and find out who is favored!
Zandrix Acob vs Gilad Tamar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Acob has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tamar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Acob, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tamar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Acob has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Acob has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tamar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Acob has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 14/ 12). Tamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/ 63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Acob winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Acob winning 2 and Tamar winning 0. The last match between Acob and Tamar was at the South Africa F1 (Stellenbosch), 19-11-2018, Q3, Hard with Zandrix Acob getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Acob and Tamar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Acob winning 0 times and Tamar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Acob winning 1, and Tamar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Acob has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tamar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Acob has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Acob has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Acob 1 - 0 Tamar
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (29-23)
Career Total W/L
48% (62-68)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Zandrix Acob | Gilad Tamar |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:0 | 1:55:0 |
1st Serve % | 72% (48/67) | 52% (46/88) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (31/48) | 54% (25/46) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 45% (19/42) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 25% (2/8) |
Return Points W% | 50% (44/88) | 39% (26/67) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-2 |
Zandrix Acob
Player
Gilad Tamar
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Zandrix Acob | Gilad Tamar |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Zandrix Acob Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alexander Jhun
Player
Zandrix Acob
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
90)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Gilad Tamar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Yanki Erel
Player
Gilad Tamar
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gilad Tamar
Player
Ori Baron
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Gilad Tamar
Player
Eduardo Cohen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Gilad Tamar
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jannik Rother
Player
Gilad Tamar
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more