Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Zack Fleishman vs Paul Goldstein Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fleishman vs Goldstein analysis and find out who is favored!
Zack Fleishman vs Paul Goldstein Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fleishman has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Goldstein has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fleishman, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Goldstein has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fleishman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goldstein has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fleishman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Goldstein winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fleishman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 21/ 25). Goldstein has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 221/ 148), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Fleishman winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Fleishman winning 3 and Goldstein winning 6. The last match between Fleishman and Goldstein was at the The USTA Challenger at West End Racquet - Torrance, 25-10-2003, Semifinals, Hard with Zack Fleishman getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fleishman and Goldstein have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fleishman winning 0 times and Goldstein 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fleishman winning 0, and Goldstein 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fleishman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Goldstein has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fleishman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goldstein has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fleishman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goldstein has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fleishman 1 - 3 Goldstein
Ret.
Rank
127
High
44
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
1
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
58
High
47
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
52% (222-205)
Career Total W/L
57% (307-235)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$100,345
Career Prize Money
$270,180
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Zack Fleishman | Paul Goldstein |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 6 |
| Games Won | 32 | 47 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-2 | |||||
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Zack Fleishman | Paul Goldstein |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Zack Fleishman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Vincent Millot
Player
Zack Fleishman
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
42%
(
49 of
118)
4
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
55 of
118)
0
Total Points Won
0
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Falla
Player
Zack Fleishman
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
48%
(
53 of
110)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sahr Timothy Kpulun
Player
Zack Fleishman
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Zack Fleishman
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Dlouhy
Player
Zack Fleishman
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Paul Goldstein Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastien Grosjean
Player
Paul Goldstein
43%
(
12 of
28)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
12 of
12)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Paul Goldstein
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Jan-Michael Gambill
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
38%
(
11 of
29)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
53%
(
17 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
32
Total Points Won
29
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Paul Goldstein
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Somdev Devvarman
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
1
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyung-Taik Lee
Player
Paul Goldstein
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
27 of
60)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Robert Kendrick
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Blake
Player
Paul Goldstein
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-0 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Goldstein
Player
Adrian Garcia
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Fleishman Vs Goldstein Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
