Zachary Eisinga vs Sebastian Sorger Important H2H Prediction Stats:

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Eisinga has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sorger has won 48.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Eisinga, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sorger has won 55.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Eisinga has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sorger has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Eisinga has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Sorger winning 53.33% (W/L 32/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Eisinga has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 41/ 35). Sorger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 44/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 42/ 36).
• Player level: In the last year, Eisinga has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Sorger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.24% of matches (W/L 32/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Eisinga winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Eisinga winning 2 and Sorger winning 0. The last match between Eisinga and Sorger was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 01-11-2021, Q2 round, Hard with Zachary Eisinga getting the victory .
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Eisinga and Sorger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Eisinga winning 0 times and Sorger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Eisinga winning 0, and Sorger 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Eisinga has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Sorger has played against players with an average rank of 230.13.
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Eisinga has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sorger has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Eisinga has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sorger has converted 42.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.