Yves Allegro vs Jae Hwan Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Allegro vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Yves Allegro vs Jae Hwan Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Allegro has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kim has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Allegro, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Allegro has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Allegro has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kim winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Allegro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 35/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 9/ 22). Kim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 17/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 102/ 70).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Allegro has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kim has played against players with an average rank of 164.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Allegro has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Allegro has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Allegro 0 - 0 Kim
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
210
High
45
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
794
Rank
794
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (113-120)
Career Total W/L
60% (122-83)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$7,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Yves Allegro | Jae Hwan Kim |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Yves Allegro Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yves Allegro
Player
Mick Lescure
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
35%
(
25 of
72)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
53%
(
43 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Matwe Middelkoop
Player
Yves Allegro
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vitali Reshetnikov
Player
Yves Allegro
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arnau Brugues-Davi
Player
Yves Allegro
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
40%
(
27 of
67)
5
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
7
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(4) ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Fernando Vicente
Player
Yves Allegro
71%
(
81 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
125)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
26%
(
30 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
125)
129
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Jae Hwan Kim Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jung-Woong Na
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Hyun Woo Cho
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sanhui Shin
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Ajeet Rai
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
9
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Cheong-Eui Kim
Player
Jae Hwan Kim
50%
(
49 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
45 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Sanhui Shin
53%
(
51 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jae Hwan Kim
Player
Simone Agostini
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more