Yuta Shimizu vs James Kent Trotter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L W L W L L
Form
L L L W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Shimizu 0 - 0 Trotter
| Shimizu | Stats | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (13-12) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 192 | Ranking | 174 |
| 181 | Highest Rank | 170 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 3 |
| 63% (265-154) | Career Total W/L | 59% (103-71) |
| $60,235 | Career Prize Money | $79,295 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muchova VS Parks PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krejcikova VS Maria PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shimizu vs Trotter Match Preview :
Analyzing the recent second serve performances, Trotter and Shimizu display notable differences. Over the past six months, Trotter has secured victories in 50.46% of points on their second serve. Shimizu, on the other hand, has managed a slightly lower rate at 47.06%. This second serve statistic significantly correlates with match prediction accuracy and often serves as an indicator of overall match performance.
Delving into return game statistics reveals further insights. Trotter has won 41.55% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Shimizu has outperformed with 46.52%. When examining first serve returns, Shimizu again edges out with a success rate of 27.29% compared to Trotter’s 19.8%. These figures suggest a stronger return game for Shimizu, which can be critical in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Trotter has demonstrated superior breakpoint resilience, saving 60.87% of breakpoints recently, compared to Shimizu's 55.17%. This capability could influence in-game betting predictions favorably for Trotter. Additionally, over the past year, Trotter has shown a higher match win rate of 63.08% (W/L 41/24) versus Shimizu's 55.88% (W/L 38/30), suggesting a more consistent overall performance.
Surface preferences add another layer of complexity to the analysis. Trotter excels on indoor hard courts with a career win percentage of 65% (W/L 37/20), although they struggle on grass with no matches won. Conversely, Shimizu's best performances occur on clay, boasting a 72% win rate (W/L 26/10), with a lower proficiency on indoor hard surfaces at 57% (W/L 21/16).
Considering their competitive experiences, both athletes primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments worth over $10K, with Trotter holding a higher win percentage of 67.86% (W/L 38/18), compared to Shimizu’s 57.58% (W/L 38/28). The differing quality of opponents, where Trotter faced an average rank of 304.14 and Shimizu contended with players averaging 281.19, is pivotal when predicting the outcome, especially relative to the tournament level.
If the match unfolds into a deciding set, Trotter shows a strong track record, winning 68% of such scenarios over the last year, whereas Shimizu stands at 55%. In terms of breakpoint conversion, Trotter narrowly leads, converting 27.18% of opportunities, while Shimizu trails closely at 26.86%, an essential statistic for in-game live betting figures.
Weighing these aspects, including match win rates, surface preferences, and in-game mental fortitude, Trotter emerges as the slight favorite to triumph in the upcoming encounter.
Shimizu vs Trotter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Yuta Shimizu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Yuta Shimizu
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Yuta Shimizu
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Benoit Paire
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve %
46%
(
11 of
24)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Yuta Shimizu
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Yuta Shimizu
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Maxime Janvier
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Denis Yevseyev
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
James Kent Trotter
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Brandon Holt
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
James Kent Trotter
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
James Kent Trotter
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Viktor Durasovic
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
9
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
32 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (265/154) | Win/Loss | 59% (103/71) |
| 60% (578/382) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (223/179) |
| 54% (4837/4173) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2102/1910) |
| 64% (208/119) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (60/41) |
| 69% (27/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 55% (26/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (39/22) |
| 67% (4/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.71 |
| 1034 | Aces Total | 1404 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 861 | Total Double Faults | 499 |
| 1:33:20 | Average Match Time | 1:38:46 |
| 480.79 | Average Opponent Rank | 397.01 |
| 62% (16779/27154) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6858/11548) |
| 68% (11382/16779) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (5249/6858) |
| 50% (5212/10375) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2402/4690) |
| 46% (1384/3009) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (357/913) |
| 42% (11745/27858) | Return Points Win % | 36% (4173/11545) |
| 20% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 55% (99/82) | Challenger W/L | 61% (75/48) |
| 71% (162/65) | Futures W/L | 61% (23/15) |
| 62% (251/402) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (101/172) |
| 100% (6/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (61/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (45/85) |
| 55% (71/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 66% (37/56) |
| 88% (253/222) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (88/79) |
| 12% (253/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (88/9) |
| 24% (166/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (86/24) |
Shimizu vs. Trotter Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
