N. Tajima
To Win
H. Chung
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W L WForm
W L W W L W W L W WThey have played 5 sets in total, with Kikuchi winning 4 and Tajima winning 1. The last match between Kikuchi and Tajima was at the M25 Burnie, 17-02-2025, Q3, Hard with Yuta Kikuchi getting the victory 2-6 6-3 12-10.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Yuta Kikuchi | 2 |
Naoki Tajima | 0 |
M25 Burnie(17-02-2025)
- / First
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-3 12-10 |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Kikuchi
Player
Naoki Tajima
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
6-3 6-2 |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Recent Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, there has been a noticeable difference in second serve performance between Kikuchi and Tajima. Kikuchi has achieved a commendable 55.6% success rate on their second serve, while Tajima has slightly lagged behind at 46.96%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Stats: Recent return game statistics shed light on Kikuchi's dominance. In their most recent form, Kikuchi has won an impressive 54.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tajima has managed to secure only 48.82%. Comparatively, Kikuchi's success rate on first serve returns stands at 38.05% versus Tajima's 37.25%. This notable disparity carries significant weight when considering the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis: When facing crucial moments in a match, such as breakpoints, Kikuchi has proven to be more resilient. Recent data reveals that Kikuchi has successfully saved 50.47% of breakpoints, while Tajima trails behind at 47.83%. This statistical insight becomes invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview: Over the past year, Kikuchi has demonstrated an impressive winning record, triumphing in 68.18% of matches played (W/L 45/21). In comparison, Tajima achieved a respectable 51.85% winning rate (W/L 28/26). Considering these figures, it becomes possible to gain an overall prediction perspective on their head-to-head encounters.
Surface Proficiency: Analyzing the players' career performance on different surfaces further enhances our predictive analysis. Kikuchi has excelled on hard courts, earning a remarkable 80% victory rate (W/L 8/2), while their weakest showing comes on clay, with a 0% success rate (W/L 0/2). Tajima, on the other hand, thrives on hard courts, achieving a 50% win rate (W/L 7/7), but struggles on grass, with a mere 20% triumph rate (W/L 1/4).
Player Level: Assessing the event level at which both players have competed becomes crucial in predicting the favorite. In the past year, Kikuchi predominantly participated in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, securing victories in 68.18% of matches (W/L 45/21). Meanwhile, Tajima's focus also gravitated towards $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, resulting in a 52.83% success rate (W/L 28/25). It is essential to acknowledge the relative nature of these statistics, taking into account the level at which the players have performed.
Direct Head-to-Head Matches: Having faced each other once before, Kikuchi emerged victorious on that occasion, whereas Tajima has yet to claim a win. The two players have contested two sets, both of which were won by Kikuchi. Their most recent encounter took place at M25 Timaru on the 11th of February 2025, played on a hard court, where Yuta Kikuchi triumphed with a score of 6-3, 6-2.
Head-to-Head Match Duration: In their past head-to-head battles, the average duration per match between these competitors has been meticulously calculated as 0:0:0.
Deciding Set Head-to-Head Prediction: Throughout their careers, Kikuchi and Tajima have engaged in decisive sets on zero occasions statistically. In the event that this match extends to a final set, this information grants valuable insight into predicting the ultimate outcome.
Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Notably, these players have never encountered a tiebreak situation. Consequently, Kikuchi and Tajima have incurred zero tiebreak wins each.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past year, Kikuchi faced opponents with an average rank of 257.76, showcasing their capability to compete against formidable rivals. In contrast, Tajima encountered opponents with a slightly lower average rank of 325.89.
Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: To provide further reassurance for live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it is crucial to consider players' performance in deciding sets. Kikuchi exhibits an admirable 47% success rate in these high-stakes situations over the past year. Tajima has also displayed determination, winning 43% of deciding sets across all matches played on the tour.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performances serve as a valuable indicator for predicting tennis matches, it is equally vital to assess current event statistics to gauge players' current form. To access up-to-date details on players' performances and their indicators of current form within this event, please refer to the relevant section.
Break Point Conversion: Notable insights can be derived from recent data regarding break point conversion rates. Kikuchi has capitalized on 48.67% of breakpoint opportunities, while Tajima has exhibited a slightly higher conversion rate of 52.04% when breaking their opponents' serve. These statistics offer valuable guidance for in-game live betting, especially when either player encounters a breakpoint.
If you seek to explore models that accurately predict tennis match outcomes, refer to this research article. Please be aware that it caters specifically to statistics enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Kikuchi
Player
Ewan Ogura
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Yuta Kikuchi
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Kikuchi
Player
Marin Dumitru
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ajeet Rai
Player
Yuta Kikuchi
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Kikuchi
Player
Naoki Tajima
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-3 12-10 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ajeet Rai
Player
Yuta Kikuchi
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Naoki Tajima
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Naoki Tajima
Player
Zhengyu Sun
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Naoki Tajima
Player
Yanjie Zheng
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Naoki Tajima
Player
Sam Ryan Ziegann
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Tajima