J. Boulais
To Win
Y. H. Hsu
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W W L LForm
W L L W W L L L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Hsu winning 2 and Moller winning 0. The last match between Hsu and Moller was at the Lyon Challenger, 10-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Yu Hsiou Hsu getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Yu Hsiou Hsu | 1 |
Elmer Moller | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Lyon Challenger(10-06-2025)
Hsu | Stats | Moller |
---|---|---|
55% (21-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 51% (18-17) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
242 | Ranking | 117 |
158 | Highest Rank | 108 |
26 | Age | 21 |
R | Plays | - |
14 | Titles | 8 |
63% (293-175) | Career Total W/L | 66% (170-89) |
$281,770 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
09 Jul 2025 / First
08 Jul 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Wimbledon - London wta
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
1:15:37 | Average Match Time | 1:15:37 |
60% (33/55) | 1st Serve % | 62% (33/53) |
67% (22/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
50% (11/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 5% (1/20) |
55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
62% (33/53) | Return Points Win % | 40% (22/55) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When analyzing the recent performance and historical data of Hsu and Moller, distinct patterns emerge that may influence the match's outcome. Moller's slight advantage in second serve performance and notable strength in return games suggest a potential edge in baseline rallies.
Additionally, Moller's ability to save breakpoints more effectively could be critical in high-pressure situations. Despite Hsu's success in deciding sets, which highlights mental fortitude, Moller's stronger track record against higher-ranked opponents implies resilience against tougher competition.
Given these factors, the match's surface could be a decisive element. Both athletes have their preferred surfaces, but if the match is not on clay, Moller may face a slight disadvantage. However, the event's level will also weigh in Moller's favor, given his experience at more competitive tournaments.
Considering these insights and current trends, Moller appears more likely to secure a victory in this upcoming encounter.
Hsu vs Moller Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mika Brunold
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Clement Tabur
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Facundo Mena
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
81%
(
65 of
80)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
13
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Elmer Moller
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tommy Paul
Player
Elmer Moller
57%
(
72 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
121)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
135
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Facundo Bagnis
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63% (293/175) | Win/Loss | 66% (170/89) |
61% (622/405) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (376/213) |
55% (5203/4251) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (3074/2404) |
66% (256/134) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (37/28) |
50% (17/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (112/49) |
38% (10/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (21/11) |
56% (10/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
1528 | Aces Total | 543 |
0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
1040 | Total Double Faults | 909 |
1:29:47 | Average Match Time | 1:31:21 |
465.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 399.87 |
64% (17600/27506) | 1st Serve % | 63% (10054/15992) |
69% (12141/17600) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (6720/10054) |
52% (5187/9906) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2804/5938) |
43% (1303/3041) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (975/2057) |
42% (11636/27999) | Return Points Win % | 45% (7516/16562) |
56% (9/7) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
67% (4/2) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
75% (3/1) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
45% (57/70) | Challenger W/L | 63% (63/37) |
70% (220/93) | Futures W/L | 69% (98/44) |
63% (285/455) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (168/251) |
60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
52% (55/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (34/67) |
56% (53/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (37/74) |
93% (287/267) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (170/149) |
7% (287/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (170/20) |
13% (180/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (89/21) |