Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Christian Langmo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W W L L W W L L
Form
W W L W W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Hsu 0 - 2 Langmo
They have played 4 sets in total, with Hsu winning 0 and Langmo winning 4. The last match between Hsu and Langmo was at the M25 Timaru, 16-02-2025, Final, Hard with Christian Langmo getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Yu Hsiou Hsu | 0 |
Christian Langmo | 2 |
M25 Timaru(16-02-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Paul PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
23 Mar 2025 / Third
Safiullin VS Mensik PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(6) 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
7-6(4) 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yu Hsiou Hsu vs Christian Langmo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Yu Hsiou Hsu 0 - 2 Christian Langmo
Predicting the Outcome of an Upcoming Tennis Match
In the realm of predictions, several key insights can shed light on the upcoming tennis match between Hsu and Langmo. Examining various statistical indicators such as second serve performance, return game stats, under pressure analysis, performance overview, preferred playing surfaces, player level, head-to-head matches, match durations, deciding set outcomes, extreme pressure situations, opponent quality, breakpoint conversion, and current event stats can provide valuable information for avid followers of the game.
Second Serve Performance in Recent Form
Crucial to match prediction accuracy, recent form reveals that in the past six months, Hsu has claimed victory in 50.51% of points on their second serve. Meanwhile, Langmo has displayed a commendable performance, winning 50.22% of such points.
Return Game Statistics
The manner in which players handle return situations can greatly influence match outcomes. Recent form shows that Hsu has triumphed in 51.49% of their opponents' second serve points, while Langmo has secured victory in 47.87% of similar situations. In terms of first serve returns, Hsu has achieved a success rate of 28.16%, as opposed to Langmo's 29.99%. These figures provide valuable insights into determining the favored player in this head-to-head (H2H) battle.
Under Pressure Analysis
When facing critical breakpoints, players' abilities to save them can significantly impact match dynamics. Recent form suggests that Hsu has successfully saved 53.33% of breakpoints, whereas Langmo has shown exceptional resilience by saving 68.25% of these crucial moments. Such statistics hold great importance when contemplating in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview
Reviewing past performances, Hsu has demonstrated an impressive win rate of 61.64% (W/L 45/28) in matches played over the past year, while Langmo boasts a commendable 60% (W/L 45/30) record. This overall head-to-head prediction overview provides valuable context for anticipating the outcome of their forthcoming encounter.
Preferred Playing Surfaces
A player's performance on different playing surfaces can offer valuable insights. On the Hard surface, Hsu has achieved their best career win percentage with a remarkable 66% (W/L 244/124), while their performance on I.hard has been relatively weaker, with a win percentage of 38% (W/L 8/13). Similarly, Langmo has excelled on the Hard surface with a win percentage of 60% (W/L 193/130) but struggled on I.hard, winning only 33% (W/L 2/4) of matches.
Player Level
The level of competition can influence players' performance and, consequently, match outcomes. In the past year, Hsu has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments worth more than $10,000, with a win rate of 47.37% (W/L 18/20). In comparison, Langmo has also primarily engaged in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10,000 in prize money, winning 54.17% of matches (W/L 26/22). When assessing player statistics to determine the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative event level at which they have been playing.
Direct Head-to-Head Matches
Past head-to-head encounters between Hsu and Langmo have occurred only once, with Langmo emerging triumphant on that occasion. They have played a total of two sets, both of which were won by Langmo. The most recent match took place at the Tyler Challenger on April 6, 2024, where Christian Langmo secured victory with a score of 7-6(4) 6-2.
Head-to-Head Match Duration
In previous head-to-head matches, the average duration has been recorded at 1 hour, 55 minutes, and 49 seconds. This statistic provides insight into the potential length of the forthcoming encounter.
Deciding Set Head-to-Head Prediction
In deciding sets, Hsu and Langmo have faced each other a total of zero times. Hsu has yet to claim victory in such scenarios, while Langmo has similarly not emerged triumphant. This statistic holds particular significance in predicting the outcome should the current match extend to a deciding set.
Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations
During their previous encounters, Hsu and Langmo have engaged in one tiebreak, with Langmo emerging as the victor. Hsu, on the other hand, has not secured a victory in this particular scenario.
Opponent Quality Statistics
Comparing the quality of opponents faced by each player over the last 12 months reveals that Hsu has encountered opponents with an average rank of 351.59, while Langmo has faced competitors with an average rank of 399.03. These figures shed light on the level of difficulty each player has encountered in their respective matches.
Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players
When matches extend to deciding sets, past trends favor Hsu, who has won 75% of such sets in the last 12 months. Langmo has also showcased impressive performance in deciding sets, claiming victory 65% of the time throughout their entire tour matches.
Current Event Head-to-Head Stats
While past player performances provide valuable insights, considering the current event's statistics is equally crucial for predicting outcomes. Observing the section below allows for a closer examination of players' performances within the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players may exhibit enhanced performance at specific events, highlighting the significance of this factor in selecting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion
Recent form reveals that Hsu has successfully converted 33.76% of breakpoints, while Langmo has achieved a conversion rate of 33.61% in breaking their opponents' serves. This statistic proves highly influential for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player finds themselves presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in delving deeper into models that predict tennis matches, this compelling article will serve as an excellent starting point (Warning: Limited to dedicated statistics enthusiasts).
Yu Hsiou Hsu Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Akira Santillan
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
50 of
79)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cruz Hewitt
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ji Sung Nam
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Jesse Delaney
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Shinji Hazawa
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
48 of
76)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Moerani Bouzige
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
16 of
30)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Govind Nanda
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Issei Okamura
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Christian Langmo Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Blake Ellis
Player
Christian Langmo
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
72%
(
83 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
61 of
115)
23
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
54 of
61)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
29 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
32 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(4) 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Other Predictions
- Loading news...