T. Machac
To Win
Q. Halys
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W L W LForm
W L W W W L L W L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Watanuki winning 1 and Machac winning 1. The last match between Watanuki and Machac was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 08-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Yosuke Watanuki getting the victory 4-6 4-2 ret..
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Yosuke Watanuki | 1 |
Tomas Machac | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(08-03-2025)
Watanuki | Stats | Machac |
---|---|---|
58% (14-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (16-9) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
184 | Ranking | 21 |
72 | Highest Rank | 20 |
27 | Age | 24 |
R | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 11 |
61% (247-160) | Career Total W/L | 66% (274-141) |
$809,485 | Career Prize Money | $3,233,215 |
0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 4-2 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Tomas Machac
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | Sets Won | 1 |
8 | Games Won | 8 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
0:56:40 | Average Match Time | 0:56:40 |
52% (22/42) | 1st Serve % | 68% (30/44) |
86% (19/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 80% (24/30) |
50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (4/14) |
100% (2/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
36% (16/44) | Return Points Win % | 31% (13/42) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the second serve statistics from recent matches, we observe Machac emerging slightly ahead. Over the past six months, Machac has secured 49.23% of points on their second serve, while Watanuki trails with 47.15%. This metric often correlates strongly with predicting match outcomes.
In terms of return game effectiveness, Machac shows an edge as well. He has managed to win 45.37% of his opponent's second serve points, surpassing Watanuki's rate of 43.44%. However, when it comes to first serve returns, Watanuki edges slightly ahead with a 22.87% success rate compared to Machac's 21.74%. Both these statistics provide significant insights into selecting the probable victor in head-to-head contests.
Considering the players' performances under pressure, Machac has successfully defended 55.3% of breakpoints in recent matches, which is higher than Watanuki's 50.27% success rate. Such statistics are particularly useful for in-game betting considerations. Moreover, in terms of converting breakpoints, Watanuki has been marginally more efficient, converting 32.32% of his opportunities compared to Machac's 31.21%.
Looking at an overview of their match win rates over the past year, Machac holds a slight advantage, having won 62.9% of his matches (39 wins/23 losses), whereas Watanuki has achieved a 60.71% win rate (17 wins/11 losses). This overall head-to-head comparison is crucial for forecasting the likely winner.
Delving into their performance on various surfaces, Machac boasts his highest career win percentage on hard courts, winning 69% of matches, while he is less accomplished on grass with a balanced 50% win rate. On the other hand, Watanuki has excelled on indoor hard courts, achieving a 69% win rate, while his least successful surface has been clay, with only a 41% success rate.
The level of competition each player has faced reveals substantial differences. Over the last year, Machac has competed primarily on the main tour, winning 68.97% of these encounters, while Watanuki has mainly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments, securing 66.67% victories. Moreover, Machac's opponents have had an average rank of 66.79, significantly higher in caliber compared to Watanuki’s average opponent rank of 213.75.
In scenarios involving deciding sets, Machac again has the upper hand, having won 70% of such matches in the past year, compared to Watanuki's 50%. This is particularly relevant for live predictions if the match progresses to a deciding set.
Taking into account all these statistics and their implications, Machac appears to be in a slightly stronger position to claim victory in this upcoming match against Watanuki. His superior performance metrics in key areas like pressure handling, overall win rate, and caliber of opposition point towards a favorable outcome for him.
Watanuki vs Machac Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ryan Peniston
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
41%
(
50 of
121)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
14
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Yi Zhou
42%
(
40 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
6
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
107
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ilia Simakin
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Li Tu
43%
(
47 of
110)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
107)
13
Aces
14
9
Double Faults
13
91%
(
43 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
49%
(
31 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
36 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Brandon Holt
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
20
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Johannus Monday
48%
(
48 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
14
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
4
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
33 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
27 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
James McCabe
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Cameron Norrie
Player
Tomas Machac
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Tommy Paul
Player
Tomas Machac
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Learner Tien
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tomas Machac
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Machac
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Sebastian Baez
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R4 | w/o | H2H | |||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Reilly Opelka
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
8
Aces
19
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (247/160) | Win/Loss | 66% (274/141) |
58% (552/403) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (623/348) |
53% (4871/4382) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5029/4117) |
63% (154/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (83/37) |
41% (18/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (79/47) |
66% (65/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (106/51) |
56% (10/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
0.61 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
2756 | Aces Total | 1779 |
0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
1443 | Total Double Faults | 800 |
1:35:12 | Average Match Time | 1:36:8 |
439.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.4 |
56% (15379/27610) | 1st Serve % | 62% (17250/27892) |
74% (11322/15379) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (12217/17221) |
50% (6150/12231) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (5760/10668) |
42% (1179/2784) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1260/2909) |
40% (11269/28347) | Return Points Win % | 40% (11579/28803) |
52% (15/14) | Slam W/L | 66% (31/16) |
68% (17/8) | Masters W/L | 55% (18/15) |
60% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 73% (8/3) |
47% (28/31) | Main Tour W/L | 64% (45/25) |
62% (145/89) | Challenger W/L | 67% (116/56) |
71% (39/16) | Futures W/L | 69% (54/24) |
61% (236/385) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (257/369) |
38% (5/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (14/28) |
51% (81/159) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (89/150) |
57% (76/133) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (63/118) |
88% (233/204) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (277/242) |
12% (233/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (277/29) |
23% (173/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (137/31) |