Yeongseok Jeong vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jeong vs Gramaticopolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Yeongseok Jeong vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jeong has won 49.01% of points on his second serve, while Gramaticopolo has won 43.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jeong, in recent form, has won 50.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gramaticopolo has won 44.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.28% and 31.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jeong has saved 59.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gramaticopolo has saved 47.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jeong has won 48.28% of matches played (W/L 14/ 15), with Gramaticopolo winning 47.37% (W/L 18/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jeong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 65/ 49), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10). Gramaticopolo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jeong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.28% of matches (W/L 14/ 15), where as Gramaticopolo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 18/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jeong winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Jeong winning 0 and Gramaticopolo winning 4. The last match between Jeong and Gramaticopolo was at the M15 Heraklion, 08-12-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Biagio Gramaticopolo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jeong and Gramaticopolo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jeong winning 0 times and Gramaticopolo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jeong winning 0, and Gramaticopolo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jeong has played against opponents with an average rank of 99.66 while Gramaticopolo has played against players with an average rank of 75.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jeong has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gramaticopolo has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jeong has converted 36.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gramaticopolo has converted 42.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jeong 0 - 2 Gramaticopolo
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
846
Rank
790
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (77-59)
Career Total W/L
47% (45-51)
25% (2-6)
YTD W/L
17% (1-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jeong VS Gramaticopolo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Yeongseok Jeong | Biagio Gramaticopolo |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
Games Won | 11 | 25 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jeong VS Gramaticopolo H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 | |||||
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Yeongseok Jeong | Biagio Gramaticopolo |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (2/6) | 17% (1/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 24% (4/13) | 29% (4/10) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (85/103) | 42% (61/85) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.06 |
Aces Total | 8 | 4 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.14 |
DFs Total | 14 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:12:30 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 74.5 |
1st Serve % | 57% (213/374) | 55% (108/198) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (142/213) | 57% (62/108) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (83/161) | 47% (42/90) |
BPs Won% Total | 19% (5/27) | 40% (6/15) |
Return Pts W% | 33% (119/363) | 35% (65/186) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 25% (2/6) | 17% (1/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (2/8) | 17% (1/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (5/0) |
Yeongseok Jeong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Koki Matsuda
Player
Yeongseok Jeong
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sander Jong
Player
Yeongseok Jeong
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
17
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Yeongseok Jeong
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yeongseok Jeong
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
43%
(
35 of
82)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 7-6(3) 10-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Yeongseok Jeong
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
F | 1-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | |||
SF |
Yeongseok Jeong
Player
Ryota Tanuma
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
106)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Biagio Gramaticopolo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Matthias Ujvary
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Rispoli
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Harrison Adams
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H |
view more