Yeon Woo Ku vs Rina Saigo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W W L
Form
W L W W L W W W W LHead-2-Head: Ku 3 - 1 Saigo
They have played 9 sets in total, with Ku winning 7 and Saigo winning 2. The last match between Ku and Saigo was at the W35 Taipei, 22-06-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Hard, with Yeon Woo Ku getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yeon Woo Ku | 3 |
| Rina Saigo | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Taipei(22-06-2025)
Yeon Woo Ku
Rina Saigo
6
1
6
4
| Ku | Stats | Saigo |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (26-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 66% (23-12) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 385 | Ranking | 352 |
| 385 | Highest Rank | 317 |
| 22 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 4 |
| 63% (183-106) | Career Total W/L | 56% (205-158) |
| $9,533 | Career Prize Money | $16,390 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Khachanov PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
08 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Swiatek VS Tauson PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
06 Jul 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Rina Saigo
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Rina Saigo
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Rina Saigo
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 2-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 48 | Games Won | 22 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:40:43 | Average Match Time | 1:40:43 |
| 65% (157/240) | 1st Serve % | 68% (142/209) |
| 66% (103/157) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (66/142) |
| 46% (38/83) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (26/67) |
| 57% (23/40) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (9/36) |
| 56% (117/209) | Return Points Win % | 41% (99/240) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ku vs Saigo Match Preview :
- Second serve performance has been slightly better for Ku, with a win percentage of 39.15% compared to Saigo's 37.69% over the last six months. Could this small edge influence the match outcome?
- In return games, Ku leads with 51.76% of points won on second serve returns, as opposed to Saigo's 48.31%. However, Saigo counters with a stronger first serve return rate of 38.71% against Ku's 35.13%. Which aspect will play a greater role?
- Under pressure, Ku has a marginally higher breakpoint save rate at 50%, barely surpassing Saigo's 49.21%. Will this make a difference in crucial match moments?
- Saigo has a slightly better overall win rate in the past year, securing victory in 65.08% of matches, while Ku has won 60.94% of their matchups. Does this signal a competitive edge?
- Looking at surface play, Saigo excels on clay with a 58% win rate, whereas Ku shines on indoor hard courts with a 69% success rate. Both have performed less effectively on grass, with Saigo winning 40% and Ku 50% of matches.
- Both have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over the last year, with Saigo winning 67.31% and Ku 60% of those matches. Does the level of competition they have faced affect their likelihood to win?
- Head-to-head, Ku has the advantage with two wins out of three matches against Saigo, including a dominant recent victory. How important are these past encounters in determining the favorite?
- Matches between Saigo and Ku last an average of 1:46:24, with just one finished in a deciding set, won by Saigo. Does this suggest Saigo is stronger if the match extends?
- Neither player has outperformed the other in tiebreak situations, as they haven't faced any against each other yet.
- On quality of opponents faced, Ku edges Saigo, playing against higher-ranked competition on average. Is this a crucial factor?
- When the match goes into a deciding set overall, Saigo has been more successful recently, winning 60% of them, while Ku stands at 29%. Could this be pivotal if they reach a third set?
- With break point conversions, Saigo has a slight edge, converting 38.26% of chances, compared to Ku's 35.19%. Will this conversion rate prove decisive?
Editorial Prediction (June 22, 2025, UTC):
Looking at the data, both Saigo and Ku show competitive metrics, yet each has distinct advantages. While Ku has been marginally stronger on second serve performance and has more head-to-head victories, Saigo demonstrates better performance under pressure when matches reach deciding stages, indicating superior resilience.
Recent results show Saigo holding a slight better record of success across different surfaces, and their ability to convert break points to a higher percentage suggests efficiency in turning opportunities into crucial points.
Despite Ku’s win in their most recent encounter, the dynamics of their previous meetings and the pressure situations analysis slightly tilt the prediction. If this match extends to a deciding set, Saigo's notable advantage in such scenarios is a key factor.
Considering these aspects, the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match is Saigo, given their slight edge in recent decisive matchups and adaptability under pressure.
Ku vs Saigo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Yeon Woo Ku Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Janice Tjen
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Misaki Matsuda
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Rina Saigo
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Dayeon Back
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Ayano Shimizu
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Vaidehi Chaudhari
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Madeleine Jessup
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
49
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dabin Kim
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
0
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
43 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Rina Saigo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Rina Saigo
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
80%
(
43 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
75%
(
74 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
103)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
49%
(
49 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Arabella Koller
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Shannon Lam
86%
(
51 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Valeria Koussenkova
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
77%
(
24 of
31)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
50
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Rina Saigo
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
56%
(
30 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
51
Total Points Won
58
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rina Saigo
Player
Elina Nepliy
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (183/106) | Win/Loss | 56% (205/158) |
| 63% (416/245) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (450/364) |
| 57% (3399/2570) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3841/3499) |
| 63% (137/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (128/97) |
| 65% (24/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (55/40) |
| 69% (20/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (20/18) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 204 | Aces Total | 132 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 927 | Total Double Faults | 589 |
| 1:24:51 | Average Match Time | 1:34:24 |
| 446.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 472.58 |
| 64% (10605/16698) | 1st Serve % | 72% (14079/19660) |
| 61% (6436/10605) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (7839/14079) |
| 45% (2755/6093) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2566/5581) |
| 52% (1260/2430) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1345/2735) |
| 50% (8343/16602) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9527/19961) |
| 29% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (4/3) | Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 60% (113/76) | Challenger W/L | 52% (116/106) |
| 74% (64/22) | Futures W/L | 63% (85/49) |
| 64% (181/285) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (201/358) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (28/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (41/66) |
| 40% (33/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (49/94) |
| 85% (190/161) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (192/169) |
| 15% (190/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (192/22) |
| 22% (99/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (170/34) |
Ku vs. Saigo Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
