Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yeon Woo Ku vs Amber Marshall Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ku vs Marshall analysis and find out who is favored!
Yeon Woo Ku vs Amber Marshall Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ku has won 40.78% of points on his second serve, while Marshall has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ku, in recent form, has won 62.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marshall has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.06% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ku has saved 55.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marshall has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ku has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Marshall winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ku has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 19/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 92/ 56). Marshall has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 34/ 26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ku has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 30/ 21), where as Marshall has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ku winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ku winning 2 and Marshall winning 1. The last match between Ku and Marshall was at the W15 Yeongwol, 30-08-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Yeon Woo Ku getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ku and Marshall have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ku winning 1 times and Marshall 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ku winning 0, and Marshall 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ku has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.88 while Marshall has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ku has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marshall has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ku has converted 52.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marshall has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ku 1 - 0 Marshall
472
Rank
411
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
610
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
64% (135-75)
Career Total W/L
55% (34-28)
68% (17-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,930
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yeon Woo Ku | Amber Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:0 | 2:1:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (63/97) | 51% (42/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (37/63) | 45% (19/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (13/34) | 37% (15/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 90% (9/10) | 44% (7/16) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (49/83) | 48% (47/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Amber Marshall
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
48%
(
47 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yeon Woo Ku | Amber Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (17/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (38/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (291/216) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.2 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (854/1293) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (548/854) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (188/439) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (111/207) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (697/1347) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (17/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (18/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Yeon Woo Ku Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Elena Malygina
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Iatcenko
Player
Yeon Woo Ku
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Aanya Choubey
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Daria Kudashova
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yeon Woo Ku
Player
Irina Maria Bara
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Amber Marshall Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Tomic
Player
Amber Marshall
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Amber Marshall
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Sakura Hosogi
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Amber Marshall
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Erin Routliffe
45%
(
28 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Amber Marshall
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Belinda Woolcock
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Alicia Smith
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ku Vs Marshall Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
