Ye Hongyu vs Mikal Statham Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Oct at 02:26 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Hongyu vs M. Statham

CHN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

NZL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Hongyu 0 - 1 Statham
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ye Hongyu winning 0 and Mikal Statham winning 2. The last match between Mikal Statham and Ye Hongyu was at the M25 Qian Daohu, 27-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Mikal Statham getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hongyu | 0 |
| Statham | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Qian Daohu(10-27-25)
Y. Hongyu vs M. Statham H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $600 |
| 49.26% (67-69) | Career Total W/L | 38.73% (79-125) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. Hongyu vs M. Statham Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows a stark contrast, with Ye Hongyu winning 43.82% of points and Mikal Statham failing to secure any points. Does this indicate an advantage for Ye Hongyu? Absolutely.
- Considering return game stats, Ye Hongyu outperforms Mikal Statham significantly, winning 40.79% of opponent's second serve points and 24.23% of first serve returns, compared to 0% for Mikal Statham.
- Under pressure, Ye Hongyu has been able to save 51.90% of breakpoints, while Mikal Statham hasn't saved any, which could heavily influence the match outcome.
- In terms of overall performance over the last year, Mikal Statham has a higher match-win percentage of 66.67% compared to Ye Hongyu's 50.00%. Does this suggest a competitive edge for Statham? Potentially in match resilience, yes.
- Best surface stats indicate both players have a 60% win rate on their preferred surfaces. Ye Hongyu excels on Indoor hard courts, while Mikal Statham is comfortable on Hard courts.
- Both players have mostly competed in lower-tier tournaments, with Mikal Statham having a slightly better win percentage, suggesting better proficiency at this level.
- When analyzing opponent quality, Ye Hongyu has faced slightly stronger competition, with an average opponent rank of 182.92 versus Statham's 205.94.
- Deciding set performance highlights Mikal Statham as more successful, winning 83% of deciding sets compared to Ye Hongyu's 56%, which might indicate stronger mental fortitude in critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the various performance statistics, Ye Hongyu appears to have a clear edge in several key areas such as second serve and return game efficiency, as well as breakpoint saves. These aspects are critical for gaining the upper hand in matches.
While Mikal Statham excels in deciding set performance, indicating a potential advantage in high-pressure scenarios, their lack of point conversion in second serves and returns could prove detrimental against a more technically skilled opponent like Ye Hongyu.
Considering both players' recent performances and strengths, Ye Hongyu seems better positioned to capitalize on Mikal Statham's weaknesses and is therefore the favorite to win this upcoming match.
Ye Hongyu vs Mikal Statham Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. Hongyu vs M. Statham H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Hongyu Recent Matches Played
M. Statham Recent Matches Played

Y. Hongyu vs M. Statham Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.26% (67/69) | YTD Win/Loss | 38.73% (79/125) |
| 48.99% (146/152) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.47% (192/271) |
| 50.65% (1472/1434) | Games Win/Loss | 47.78% (2012/2199) |
| 46.07% (41/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.07% (69/95) |
| 54.05% (20/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 30.30% (10/23) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/5) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 147 | Aces Total | 59 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 205 | Total Double Faults | 70 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 154.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.01 |
| 63% (2485/3921) | 1st Serve % | 66% (1132/1705) |
| 65% (1622/2485) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (668/1132) |
| 48% (691/1436) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (283/572) |
| 41% (149/365) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (60/138) |
| 39% (1518/3882) | Return Points Win % | 37% (606/1630) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 49.26% (67/69) | Futures W/L | 39.34% (72/111) |
| 49% (65/134) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (79/204) |
| 56% (15/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (13/37) |
| 48% (14/29) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (21/55) |
| 90% (62/56) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (84/70) |
| 10% (62/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (84/14) |
| 14% (73/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (120/9) |