Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Uchiyama vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Uchiyama has won 52.71% of points on his second serve, while Carabelli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Uchiyama, in recent form, has won 50.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.71% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Uchiyama has saved 63.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Uchiyama has won 62.71% of matches played (W/L 37/ 22), with Carabelli winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Uchiyama has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 312/ 219), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Uchiyama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.04% of matches (W/L 35/ 18), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Uchiyama has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.54 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Uchiyama has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Uchiyama has converted 42.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Uchiyama 0 - 0 Carabelli
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yasutaka Uchiyama | Camilo UGO Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (15/6) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (31/19) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (251/209) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 76% (13/4) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.52 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 118 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 319.33 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (929/1473) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (677/929) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (286/544) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (57/143) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (584/1506) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (15/6) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (15/21) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 88% (7/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 44% (9/4) | 1st Match |
Yasutaka Uchiyama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Seong Chan Hong
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
James Duckworth
58%
(
69 of
119)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
46 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Dane Sweeny
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
16
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jan Choinski
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luis Britto
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Uchiyama Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
