MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Yassine Smiej vs Maxime Chazal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Smiej 0 - 1 Chazal

They have played 2 sets in total, with Smiej winning 0 and Chazal winning 2. The last match between Smiej and Chazal was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, Clay with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 6-0 6-3.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Yassine Smiej 0
Maxime Chazal 1

Brazzaville Challenger(18-02-2025)

Stats
36% (4-7)
YTD Win/Loss
56% (10-8)
0
Head-to-Head
1
N/A
Ranking
335
Highest Rank
234
25
Age
31
-
Plays
R
0
Titles
14
50% (51-51)
Career Total W/L
60% (485-317)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,860
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
1
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Upcoming Match

ODDS

M. Chazal

To Win

TBD

To Win

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Sabalenka VS Zheng PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Qinwen Zheng

To Win

59.87 %
31.7%

Svitolina VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

24 Mar 2025 / Fourth

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Iga Swiatek

To Win

90.1 %
12.58%

Smiej VS Chazal H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-0 6-3
cross
Maxime Chazal
Player
Yassine Smiej
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve %
45% ( 25 of 55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 17 of 25)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 10 of 30)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
26% ( 12 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 28 of 55)
62
Total Points Won
39

Smiej VS Chazal H2H Stats

Yassine Smiej Smiej
Stats
Maxime Chazal Chazal
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
3
Games Won
12
2
Aces (Total)
0
12
Total Double Faults
2
1:18:43
Average Match Time
1:18:43
45% (25/55)
1st Serve %
72% (33/46)
68% (17/25)
1st Serve Win %
79% (26/33)
33% (10/30)
2nd Serve Win %
62% (8/13)
0% (0/2)
Break Points Won % (Total)
40% (4/10)
26% (12/46)
Return Points Win %
51% (28/55)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Yassine Smiej vs Maxime Chazal Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Yassine Smiej 0 - 1 Maxime Chazal

Insights on the upcoming tennis match:

  1. In terms of second serve performance, recent data indicates that Smiej has a success rate of 37.88%, while Chazal has an impressive 50.06% conversion rate. It is worth noting that there exists a significant association between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. When considering return game statistics, Smiej has outperformed their opponents on second serve points recently, winning 55.64% of them. Conversely, Chazal has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 52.81%. The figures for first serve returns are 35.09% for Smiej and 34.53% for Chazal, respectively. This aspect plays a crucial role in determining the favored player in their head-to-head battle.
  3. An analysis of performance under pressure reveals that Smiej has managed to save 44.16% of breakpoints, whereas Chazal has impressively saved 60.33%. This particular statistic proves invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
  4. Examining their overall performance over the past year, Smiej has achieved a 49.02% victory rate in matches played, with a win-to-loss record of 25/26. On the other hand, Chazal boasts an impressive 64.94% success rate, having won 50 out of 77 matches played. This comprehensive overview sheds light on the predicted outcome of their head-to-head matchup.
  5. Considering each player's best surface, Smiej has excelled on hard courts, securing a 54% win rate. Conversely, their performance on clay courts has been slightly weaker, with a 43% success rate. In contrast, Chazal demonstrates their prowess on clay courts, winning 64% of matches played, while their least successful surface is indoor hard courts with a 31% win rate.
  6. When evaluating player level, it is important to note that Smiej has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, achieving a 49.02% success rate in matches played. On the other hand, Chazal has predominantly participated in similar tournaments, winning an impressive 73.58% of their matches. These statistics should be taken into consideration when predicting the favored player, as they largely depend on the level of the event.
  7. Examining the quality of opponents faced, Smiej has encountered players with an average ranking of 160.22 in the past year, whereas Chazal has faced opponents with an average ranking of 413.12.
  8. In the event that this match reaches a deciding set, it is interesting to note that Smiej has won 36% of deciding sets over the past year, while Chazal has a commendable success rate of 65% in all matches played on the tour. This information can be particularly useful for live predictions and betting purposes.
  9. While past player performance serves as a valuable predictor of tennis matches, it is essential to also consider current event stats for insights on the in-form player. By reviewing the section below (if available), one can gain a deeper understanding of the outcome. Additionally, certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, a factor that should be included in the decision-making process.
  10. An important aspect to consider during live betting is break point conversion. In recent matches, Smiej has successfully converted 46.61% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Chazal has achieved a similar rate of 47.16% when it comes to breaking their opponents' serves. This statistic provides invaluable information for in-game live betting tips.
  11. If you have a keen interest in models for predicting tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point for your research. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts)

Yassine Smiej Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q2
L
4-6 7-5 10-8 H2H
Q1
W
7-6(4) 6-3 H2H
Q2
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-1 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Maxime Chazal
Player
Yassine Smiej
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve %
45% ( 25 of 55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 17 of 25)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 10 of 30)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
26% ( 12 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 28 of 55)
62
Total Points Won
39
L
6-0 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Cian Maguire
Player
Yassine Smiej
83% ( 73 of 88)
1st Serve %
66% ( 57 of 87)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
53% ( 39 of 73)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 37 of 57)
47% ( 7 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 8 of 30)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
48% ( 42 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 42 of 87)
88
Total Points Won
87
L
6-7(6) 6-4 11-9 H2H
Q2
W
4-6 6-0 10-8 H2H
Q1
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
Q1
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
L
6-4 3-6 10-3 H2H

Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Ignacio Parisca
Player
Maxime Chazal
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve %
56% ( 39 of 70)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
63% ( 19 of 30)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 20 of 39)
37% ( 7 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
80% ( 4 of 5)
47% ( 23 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 38 of 70)
64
Total Points Won
55
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Maxime Chazal
79% ( 41 of 52)
1st Serve %
60% ( 32 of 53)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
80% ( 33 of 41)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 24 of 32)
55% ( 6 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
60% ( 3 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
25% ( 13 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 20 of 53)
59
Total Points Won
46
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Valentin Royer
Player
Maxime Chazal
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve %
54% ( 32 of 59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 22 of 32)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
24% ( 12 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 26 of 59)
64
Total Points Won
45
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Dinko Dinev
Player
Maxime Chazal
73% ( 45 of 62)
1st Serve %
69% ( 40 of 58)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80% ( 36 of 45)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 31 of 40)
47% ( 8 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
29% ( 18 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 21 of 58)
65
Total Points Won
55
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Maxime Chazal
Player
Yassine Smiej
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve %
45% ( 25 of 55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
79% ( 26 of 33)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 17 of 25)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 10 of 30)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
26% ( 12 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 28 of 55)
62
Total Points Won
39
W
6-0 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Maxime Chazal
74% ( 75 of 101)
1st Serve %
74% ( 92 of 125)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61% ( 46 of 75)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 47 of 92)
46% ( 12 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 17 of 33)
44% ( 7 of 16)
Break Points Won
50% ( 6 of 12)
43% ( 43 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 61 of 125)
119
Total Points Won
107
L
6-3 5-7 7-6(1) H2H
QF
cross
Maxime Chazal
Player
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
65% ( 57 of 88)
1st Serve %
63% ( 57 of 90)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67% ( 38 of 57)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 39 of 57)
61% ( 19 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 16 of 33)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
35% ( 31 of 88)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 35 of 90)
92
Total Points Won
86
W
5-7 6-3 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jeremy Gschwendtner
65% ( 24 of 37)
1st Serve %
59% ( 29 of 49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88% ( 21 of 24)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 17 of 29)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
22% ( 8 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 24 of 49)
53
Total Points Won
33
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Maxime Chazal
Player
Anas Mazdrashki
71% ( 63 of 89)
1st Serve %
61% ( 66 of 108)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
65% ( 41 of 63)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 39 of 66)
46% ( 12 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 17 of 42)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
40% ( 36 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 52 of 108)
105
Total Points Won
92
W
4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Hugo Dellien
Player
Maxime Chazal
62% ( 34 of 55)
1st Serve %
64% ( 36 of 56)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71% ( 24 of 34)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
67% ( 14 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 11 of 20)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
31% ( 17 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 22 of 56)
60
Total Points Won
51
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

50% (51/51)
Win/Loss
60% (485/317)
50% (114/115)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (1063/764)
50% (1087/1076)
Games Win/Loss
54% (9085/7887)
53% (39/34)
Hard Win/Loss
43% (30/39)
41% (12/17)
Clay Win/Loss
63% (447/260)
0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L
31% (8/18)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.01
Aces Per Game
0.12
13
Aces Total
1008
0.2
Double Faults Per Game
0.16
211
Total Double Faults
1343
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:18:2
165.32
Average Opponent Rank
558.38
71% (1949/2744)
1st Serve %
68% (26531/39216)
55% (1067/1949)
1st Serve Win %
65% (17173/26531)
39% (311/795)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (6183/12684)
45% (130/287)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (2051/4409)
43% (1145/2651)
Return Points Win %
43% (16405/38113)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
18% (2/9)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Challenger W/L
42% (62/84)
50% (51/50)
Futures W/L
65% (421/222)
50% (50/101)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
61% (479/783)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/4)
60% (6/10)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (97/188)
50% (13/26)
Deciding Set Win %
61% (144/238)
85% (54/46)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (459/404)
13% (54/7)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (459/53)
8% (48/4)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (342/81)

See recent tennis photos of Smiej and Chazal

Other Predictions

  • Loading news...