Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yannick Mertens vs Filip Veger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mertens vs Veger analysis and find out who is favored!
Yannick Mertens vs Filip Veger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mertens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Veger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mertens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Veger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mertens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Veger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mertens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Veger winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mertens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 206/ 129), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Veger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Mertens has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Veger has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mertens winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mertens winning 0 and Veger winning 2. The last match between Mertens and Veger was at the St. Remy Challenger, 08-09-2015, First, Hard with Filip Veger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mertens and Veger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mertens winning 0 times and Veger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mertens winning 0, and Veger 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mertens has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Veger has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mertens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Veger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mertens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Veger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mertens 0 - 1 Veger
878
Rank
179
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
478
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
59% (629-443)
Career Total W/L
51% (150-142)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$72,235
Career Prize Money
$6,370
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yannick Mertens | Filip Veger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:52 | 1:8:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (36/60) | 80% (47/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (20/36) | 64% (30/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 58% (7/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (22/59) | 48% (29/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Filip Veger
Player
Yannick Mertens
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yannick Mertens | Filip Veger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Yannick Mertens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Yannick Mertens
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Yannick Mertens
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Yannick Mertens
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Yannick Mertens
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Yannick Mertens
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Yannick Mertens
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Yannick Mertens
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
11
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Yannick Mertens
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Yannick Mertens
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Mertens
Player
Luke Johnson
74%
(
99 of
134)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
7
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
112
Total Points Won
118
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Filip Veger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Filipenko
Player
Filip Veger
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Hernych
Player
Filip Veger
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Arturs Lazdins
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Filip Veger
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Lloyd Harris
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Filip Veger
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Veger
Player
Kristian Lozan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dino Marcan
Player
Filip Veger
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denys Molchanov
Player
Filip Veger
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mertens Vs Veger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
