T. Skatov
To Win
D. Cukierman
To Win
Yannick Hanfmann vs Daniel Cukierman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W L W L L
Form
L L L L L W L W L WHead To Head: Hanfmann 1 - 0 Cukierman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hanfmann winning 2 and Cukierman winning 0. The last match between Hanfmann and Cukierman was at the Davis Cup, World Group, Q, ISR-GER 1-3, 31-01-2025, Rubber 2, I.hard with Yannick Hanfmann getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yannick Hanfmann | 1 |
| Daniel Cukierman | 0 |
Davis Cup, World Group, Q, ISR-GER 1-3(31-01-2025)
6
4
6
4
Upcoming Match
24 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Eala VS Gibert PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
8
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yannick Hanfmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
82%
(
63 of
77)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
87 of
138)
9
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
30%
(
7 of
23)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
60 of
138)
133
Total Points Won
121
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Manuel Guinard
77%
(
63 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Hugo Gaston
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Valentin Vacherot
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Daniel Cukierman
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Norbert Gombos
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Daniel Cukierman
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Daniel Cukierman
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
16
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Daniel Cukierman
73%
(
61 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Daniel Cukierman
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (359/263)
Win/Loss
57% (256/193)
55% (811/656)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (573/442)
52% (7342/6652)
Games Win/Loss
53% (4841/4272)
51% (68/65)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (181/134)
63% (212/126)
Clay Win/Loss
60% (50/34)
54% (63/53)
Indoor Hard W/L
51% (25/24)
46% (16/19)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.37
Aces Per Game
0.16
2545
Aces Total
722
0.18
Double Faults Per Game
0.23
1220
Total Double Faults
1037
1:24:6
Average Match Time
1:11:28
401.63
Average Opponent Rank
417.28
64% (24071/37697)
1st Serve %
63% (13536/21431)
70% (16865/24071)
1st Serve Win %
66% (8937/13536)
52% (7146/13626)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (3840/7895)
40% (1499/3752)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (1141/2422)
39% (15334/39426)
Return Points Win %
43% (9352/21654)
43% (21/28)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (20/20)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
80% (4/1)
Cups W/L
38% (5/8)
54% (97/83)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
58% (131/93)
Challenger W/L
48% (46/49)
69% (86/38)
Futures W/L
60% (205/135)
59% (351/596)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
57% (252/440)
16% (3/19)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
44% (89/201)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
48% (43/89)
56% (114/202)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (61/124)
84% (359/302)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (254/223)
16% (359/56)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (254/30)
21% (263/56)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
16% (194/32)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
