Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yankel Zemel vs Gilad Tamar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zemel vs Tamar analysis and find out who is favored!
Yankel Zemel vs Gilad Tamar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zemel has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Tamar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zemel, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tamar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zemel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zemel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Tamar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zemel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 124/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Tamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/ 63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zemel winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Zemel winning 4 and Tamar winning 0. The last match between Zemel and Tamar was at the Israel F14 (Meitar), 14-10-2018, Q3, Hard with Yankel Zemel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zemel and Tamar have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zemel winning 0 times and Tamar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Zemel winning 1, and Tamar 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zemel has played against opponents with an average rank of while Tamar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zemel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zemel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zemel 2 - 0 Tamar
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
53% (129-115)
Career Total W/L
48% (62-68)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yankel Zemel | Gilad Tamar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:44:0 | 0:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (26/49) | 46% (32/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (21/26) | 66% (21/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 41% (15/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (33/69) | 31% (15/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Yankel Zemel
Player
Gilad Tamar
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yankel Zemel | Gilad Tamar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Yankel Zemel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Yankel Zemel
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Hasson
Player
Yankel Zemel
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yankel Zemel
Player
Niv Zuckerman
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
36 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-0 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandr Lobanov
Player
Yankel Zemel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gilad Tamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Gilad Tamar
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Ori Baron
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Eduardo Cohen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Gilad Tamar
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jannik Rother
Player
Gilad Tamar
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Zemel Vs Tamar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
