Yanaki Milev vs Cosmin Ontica Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milev vs Ontica analysis and find out who is favored!
Yanaki Milev vs Cosmin Ontica Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milev has won 46.35% of points on his second serve, while Ontica has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milev, in recent form, has won 51.27% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ontica has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milev has saved 54.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ontica has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milev has won 50% of matches played (W/L 27/ 27), with Ontica winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 66/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ontica has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 78/ 75), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Milev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 23/ 14), where as Ontica has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milev winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Milev winning 1 and Ontica winning 0. The last match between Milev and Ontica was at the M15 Burgas, 06-10-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Yanaki Milev getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milev and Ontica have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milev winning 0 times and Ontica 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Milev winning 0, and Ontica 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milev has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.24 while Ontica has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milev has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ontica has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milev has converted 49.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ontica has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Milev 1 - 0 Ontica
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
594
Rank
482
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (71-52)
Career Total W/L
51% (100-97)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Yanaki Milev | Cosmin Ontica |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
Games Won | 4 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-3 ret. |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Yanaki Milev | Cosmin Ontica |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (32/26) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (287/263) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 62% (13/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
Aces Total | 79 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
DFs Total | 87 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:51:42 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 163.83 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (977/1722) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (676/977) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (339/745) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (93/186) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (728/1680) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (13/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Yanaki Milev Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Yanaki Milev
Player
Tomas Lanik
60%
(
78 of
131)
1st Serve %
52%
(
65 of
124)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
57 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
127
|
4-6 7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Constantin Spiridon
Player
Yanaki Milev
63%
(
67 of
106)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
103)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Yanaki Milev
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yanaki Milev
Player
Fabrizio Andaloro
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Yanaki Milev
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Andrea Picchione
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Stijn Slump
Player
Yanaki Milev
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Yanaki Milev
Player
Stefan Palosi
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Yanaki Milev
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
75%
(
94 of
126)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yanaki Milev
Player
Thomas Faurel
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
3
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Cosmin Ontica Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Cosmin Ontica
Player
Alexandru Luca
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Cosmin Ontica
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve %
40%
(
12 of
30)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
32
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 5-7 6-0 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more